Forum:New page shock: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:


Mini-mitch didn't write that. He restored the content that was put up for deletion which you removed when you put up the template. The same unregistered user who created the page was the one who wrote the question. --[[User:Nyktimos|Nyktimos]] 20:03, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
Mini-mitch didn't write that. He restored the content that was put up for deletion which you removed when you put up the template. The same unregistered user who created the page was the one who wrote the question. --[[User:Nyktimos|Nyktimos]] 20:03, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
: Yes, as Nyktimos said, it was the unregistered user's message. When you add the delete template, you shouldn't really remove the content. Though if it really is bad, such as lots of swearing etc, then I think it would be understandable. [[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 20:07, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:07, 4 June 2010

IndexPanopticon → New page shock
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.




This is anoying Basicly I Put A new page up for delition and this was added by mini mich

ANDREW, ARE YOU STILL THERE?

which hapens to be my name but still this is very strange please look into this

a very shocked Drwhoworld 19:51, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Mini-mitch didn't write that. He restored the content that was put up for deletion which you removed when you put up the template. The same unregistered user who created the page was the one who wrote the question. --Nyktimos 20:03, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Yes, as Nyktimos said, it was the unregistered user's message. When you add the delete template, you shouldn't really remove the content. Though if it really is bad, such as lots of swearing etc, then I think it would be understandable. The Thirteenth Doctor 20:07, June 4, 2010 (UTC)