Tardis:User rights nominations: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(360 intermediate revisions by 74 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Please put nominations (including self-nominations) for special user rights below.  Add supporting or dissenting comments under the nominations.  
Please put nominations (including self-nominations) for special [[Tardis:User rights|user rights]] below. Do so by using the following format. Please cut and paste the entirety of this format, and put it underneath the most '''recent''' nominee in the section. Where the format says "UserName", please ensure you change it to their actual user name.
<pre>
===[[Special:Contributions/UserName|UserName]]===
:'''The rationale for nominating this user is:'''
====Support====
:'''Please outline the reasons you support this nomination below:'''
====Oppose====
:'''Why do you oppose this nomination?'''
====Neutral====
:'''Feeling lukewarm about this user?  Tell us why.'''
====Comments and concerns====
:'''Do you have specific concerns about this user that are getting in the way of you making up your mind? Leave them here for the nominee to address.'''  To the nominee: failure to respond to comments left here may weigh against you when it comes time to close the nomination.
</pre>


Adjustments may be made for special circumstances, but in general there will be at least a one week comment period.
Adjustments may be made for special circumstances, but in general there will be at least a one week comment period.


See [[Wikia:Help:User access levels]] and [[Wikia:Help:Administrators' how-to guide]] for more information about these roles.  [[Special:Listusers/sysop]] shows the current admins, bureaucrats and staff IDs.
See [[Tardis:How do I become an admin?|How do I become an admin?]] for additional questions and information on administrator roles on the Tardis Data Core Doctor Who Wiki. For more general information about becoming an administrator see [[w:c:community:User_blog:Brandon_Rhea/Tips_for_becoming_an_admin|Community Central - Tips for becoming an admin]]


==Administrators==
For more information on these roles see [[Help:User access levels]]. [[Special:Listusers/sysop]] shows the current admins, bureaucrats and staff IDs.
An administrator has special responsibilities to watch over the wiki.  In order to make it easier to fulfill those responsibilities, and admin can block user IDs or IP edits, protect pages and revert pages more easily.


Nominations:
* [[Tardis:User rights nominations/Archive|Archived nominations]]
*[[User:Dark Lord Xander]], Nominating Myself ,I'm always around working on articles, Like helping new users and hate vandals. [[User:Dark Lord Xander|Dark Lord Xander]] 02:36, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
**'''Opposed'''.  I know you're frequently present and a tireless contributor.  I also think that your residency in Australia makes you a strong candidate because you would logically be online at a time other admins might not.  But your grasp of English grammar and punctuation is extremely problematic.  A quick glance at [[:user:Dark Lord Xander|your user page]] — or even the sentence you typed above — is proof enough of that.  A lot of times,  I don't understand the points you're trying to make. 


:I'm also not convinced that you have a sound grasp of the original series, nor — because you say you don't own even one original series episode — can you seriously conduct research on it.  It worries me that you don't, therefore, seem to have the tools to knowledgeably balance your appreciation of spin-off material against televised material.  Moreover, a lot of the pages you have created have been extremely sketchy, such as [[Grant Morrison]] and ''[[The Infinity Season]]''.  The bulk of what you create for the site are simple placeholders; you tend to leave the hard work of synopses, references and general linkages to others. 
----


:Your lone in-universe article, [[Dalek Flying Saucer]], is problematic from its very name.  You seem to accept that "Dalek Flying Saucer" is what the thing ''should'' be called, without ever mentioning that its actual Dalek (that is, in-universe) name has never been given.   
== Admins ==


:I should point out as well that a review of your [[Special:Editcount/Dark Lord Xander|edit count]] reveals overwhelming contributions to the mainspace, with no work on templates  on any site, and only one category edit on this site.  This reveals either a lack of interest or knowledge about building the backbone of wikis.  Moreover your edits to talk pages are disturbingly low, meaning you're not that committed to inviting discussion and achieving consensus.  
An administrator has special responsibilities to watch over the wiki. In order to make it easier to fulfill those responsibilities, and admin can block user IDs or IP edits, protect pages and revert pages more easily.


:I just don't see that your basic editing work warrants giving you additional oversight powers at this time. '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]'''  [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 03:45, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Nominations:
 
:: Fair enough, I just thought I'd give it a try and let people know i am interested. --[[User:Dark Lord Xander|Dark Lord Xander]] 05:05, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 
*[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]] 13:11, 24 August 2008 (UTC) I have sked Tangerine duel before and he said hed think about it, I am one of the most active users on this wiki and I know a lot of my edits are'nt everyones favorite but I have made alot of useful contributions (in my opinion anyway). I would be able to make many more with advanced..tools. Thanks.


==Bureaucrats==
== Bureaucrats ==
A bureaucrat has the same rights as an administrator and the additional permission to create new administrators and bureaucrats.
A bureaucrat has the same rights as an administrator and the additional permission to create new administrators and bureaucrats.


Nominations:
Nominations:


[[Category:TARDIS Index File Wiki]]
[[Category:Nomination pages|*]]
[[Category:How do I become an admin?]]

Latest revision as of 07:53, 28 March 2024

Please put nominations (including self-nominations) for special user rights below. Do so by using the following format. Please cut and paste the entirety of this format, and put it underneath the most recent nominee in the section. Where the format says "UserName", please ensure you change it to their actual user name.

===[[Special:Contributions/UserName|UserName]]===
:'''The rationale for nominating this user is:'''
====Support====
:'''Please outline the reasons you support this nomination below:''' 
====Oppose====
:'''Why do you oppose this nomination?'''
====Neutral====
:'''Feeling lukewarm about this user?  Tell us why.'''
====Comments and concerns====
:'''Do you have specific concerns about this user that are getting in the way of you making up your mind?  Leave them here for the nominee to address.'''  To the nominee: failure to respond to comments left here may weigh against you when it comes time to close the nomination.

Adjustments may be made for special circumstances, but in general there will be at least a one week comment period.

See How do I become an admin? for additional questions and information on administrator roles on the Tardis Data Core Doctor Who Wiki. For more general information about becoming an administrator see Community Central - Tips for becoming an admin

For more information on these roles see Help:User access levels. Special:Listusers/sysop shows the current admins, bureaucrats and staff IDs.


Admins[[edit source]]

An administrator has special responsibilities to watch over the wiki. In order to make it easier to fulfill those responsibilities, and admin can block user IDs or IP edits, protect pages and revert pages more easily.

Nominations:

Bureaucrats[[edit source]]

A bureaucrat has the same rights as an administrator and the additional permission to create new administrators and bureaucrats.

Nominations: