Tardis:User rights nominations: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(328 intermediate revisions by 70 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Please put nominations (including self-nominations) for special user rights below. Add supporting or dissenting comments under the nominations.
Please put nominations (including self-nominations) for special [[Tardis:User rights|user rights]] below. Do so by using the following format. Please cut and paste the entirety of this format, and put it underneath the most '''recent''' nominee in the section. Where the format says "UserName", please ensure you change it to their actual user name.
<pre>
===[[Special:Contributions/UserName|UserName]]===
:'''The rationale for nominating this user is:'''
====Support====
:'''Please outline the reasons you support this nomination below:'''
====Oppose====
:'''Why do you oppose this nomination?'''
====Neutral====
:'''Feeling lukewarm about this user?  Tell us why.'''
====Comments and concerns====
:'''Do you have specific concerns about this user that are getting in the way of you making up your mind?  Leave them here for the nominee to address.'''  To the nominee: failure to respond to comments left here may weigh against you when it comes time to close the nomination.
</pre>


Adjustments may be made for special circumstances, but in general there will be at least a one week comment period.
Adjustments may be made for special circumstances, but in general there will be at least a one week comment period.


See [[Tardis:Questions and guide to requests for adminship]] for additional questions and information on adminstrator roles on the TARDIS Index File Doctor Who Wiki.
See [[Tardis:How do I become an admin?|How do I become an admin?]] for additional questions and information on administrator roles on the Tardis Data Core Doctor Who Wiki. For more general information about becoming an administrator see [[w:c:community:User_blog:Brandon_Rhea/Tips_for_becoming_an_admin|Community Central - Tips for becoming an admin]]


See also [[WikiaHelp:User access levels]] and [[WikiaHelp:Administrators' how-to guide]] for more information about these roles. [[Special:Listusers/sysop]] shows the current admins, bureaucrats and staff IDs.
For more information on these roles see [[Help:User access levels]]. [[Special:Listusers/sysop]] shows the current admins, bureaucrats and staff IDs.


*[[Tardis:User rights nominations/Archive|Archived nominations]]
* [[Tardis:User rights nominations/Archive|Archived nominations]]


----
----
=== [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]] ===
I have opted to go along the same line as Solar Dragon here, as I agree it is more clean than before, and easier to read.


Rightly then. I feel I have been around for a fair amount of time, now and have a reasonable amount of edit made so far, and still counting. I feel I have mad e effective contribution to this, such as: Raising the point over the ''Discontinuity, plot hole and errors'' section, and help with the shift into ''Production Errors'' and also helped to removed quotes after the Manual of Style was changed. I also created the ''Layout for individuals'' page, with help from [[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]], as he went through and improve it.
== Admins ==


To help edit this wiki, I occasionally check the ''special pages'' page and added categories to uncategorised pages and categories, and I have created navigation template for characters/species which I feel need one. Some of these include: ''Christmas Specials'', ''Time Lord Episodes'' and ''Auton Stories''
An administrator has special responsibilities to watch over the wiki. In order to make it easier to fulfill those responsibilities, and admin can block user IDs or IP edits, protect pages and revert pages more easily.


I also keep an eye of unregistered contributors, and view what they edit and put on, even if that means I have to deal with abusive message on my talk and user page. I also do have a history of edits, where I need to be told its wrong/not the right thing to do - however I check the Manual of Style and correct, and accept my mistakes. I usually also consult the manual of style if I feel a user have made a edit which I feel is against the manual of style, and when the User is wrong, I normally information the use on their talk page.
Nominations:
 
Also, I have my views seen many times in the forums. I try my best to come up with the best solutions, and once a agreement has been reached, I am always willing to take a role in rolling out the new ideas into this wiki (such as the quotes).
 
The pages which I am proud of are: my heavy edits to the [[Series 3 (Torchwood)]] page, before it was released. On this page I turned it into a proper episode pages, and sorted out all the headings and put the correct information under them. I am partially proud of turning the [[Series 5 (Doctor Who)]] page into a proper series page where as before it had only the cast and rumours. I turned it from that into a proper series pages, and thinned out the rumours and adding the correct headings, and it has since then grown to what it is now. Thirdly, I am proud of the pages where I have been involved with the removing of the discontinuity and the adding of production errors, which I myself brought up the subject again. I am also proud of the [[Tardis:Guide to writing Individuals articles]] page, which I created, and even with your heavy edits to it, I feel that some on my work I did while creating it is still there, and I feel that by creating that, I helped with making this wiki even better. Lastly, I am proud of the navigation templates I have created, especially the ''[[Template:Time Lord stories|Time Lord stories]]'', ''[[Template:TorchwoodNovelsandAudio|Torchwood Novels and Audio]]'' and ''[[Template:Christmas specials|Christmas specials]]''
 
The pages which I feel show my creative skills are: Many of the actor pages I have created and also my edits to pages that have the wrong layout. Many of these are the audio adventures, and I have recognised this and changed them to how they should be laid out, and put the information under the correct headings on when they are not. Many audio adventures have wrong or incorrect headings on them, and I have gone though some some them and changed them to how the manual of style says they should be laid out. I am also proud of my early edits to the [[2009 Specials (Doctor Who)]] page, it was here I spend most of my early edits, as I joined this wiki just prior to [[Planet of the Dead (TV story)|Planet of the Dead]] aired, i know I have had some daft edits with them, but now fell I am a more experienced user.
 
I usually use edit summaries, especially when I feel a point is need to get across to either certain users or the wiki in general. I also use the talk page on different articles, usually when I put something up for deletion, which normally explain my views and points for why I think the page should be deleted. I also have voice on the talk page, putting my views across whether it be under a point someone has raised on the talk page, the page being moved, or an argument for or against deletions.
 
I feel that I have a good deal of knowledge of the Doctor Who Universe as well. I have watched Doctor Who since the revived series, and have seen all the episodes of The Sarah Jane Adventures and Torchwood, and always searched for the lasted news of the official sites. I also have a vast section of classic series of Doctor Who on DVD, and I always keep up to date with the latests audio adventures and the novels so I have full awareness of what is happening in the Doctor Who Universe.
 
My grammar edit are usually very good. Under my 'To Do List' on my user page, one of the things I am working on is fixing any grammar and spelling edits. And also I have looked and understood many of the policies on the wiki, spending time learning what each policy is and understanding them. I have always looked through and read each copyright tag for images, and always put the correct one on any images I have uploaded.
 
Lastly, I feel I offer advice and also help other user when they need it or do something wrong. I feel I explain what I mean to them clearly, and help them to have a better contribution to this wiki, instead of doing stuff wrong, I would explain what they are doing wrong and why - this included explaining to users if they have vandalised pages, and sometimes got abused back from it, to which I have responded by having to explain stuff to them again.
 
I feel that if I do become an admin, I will be able to contribute much more effectively to this wiki, and also be able to improve this wiki, and provide all the help I can to other Users. [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]] 18:32, June 17. 2010 (UTC)
 
====Support====
*Mini-mitch is a great user who regularly edits, reverts vandalism, helps towards developing policies and enforcing them. When I first started here I initially thought that he was an Admin with the number of edits he has and the quality of them. I'd support his promotion to admin. --[[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 18:45, June 18, 2010 (UTC)
*Dedicated editor who keeps order on the wikia and prevents vandalism. Strong editor and good candidate for admin. --[[User:Revanvolatrelundar|Revan]]\[[User_talk:Revanvolatrelundar|Talk]] 20:28, February 2, 2011 (UTC)
 
====Neutral====
 
====Oppose====
 
====Comment and Questions====
===[[User:Revanvolatrelundar|Revanvolatrelundar]]===
''Just moving my request from talk pages to this page for ease.''
 
Ive been thinking recently about how work ive been putting into the wikia and have been wondering whether I could be considered in beccoming an admin. I'm certainly dedicated to the wikia and put lots of time into it and i'm willing to put alot more work into the wikia if I was an admin. Would you consider me to become an admin? --[[User:Revanvolatrelundar|Revan]]\[[User talk:Revanvolatrelundar|Talk]] 13:36, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
 
I think of all my creations the [[War King]] article is one of my proudest achievements (and expensive [[Perfect Timing 2]] set me back quite a bit). Although not my creation, i have placed vast amounts of information into the [[Eighth Doctor]] article and have now almost read and listened to all of his stories to try and fill the gaps that existed in the page. I have also added to some of the less... popular or open spin offs such as Iris Wildthyme and Faction Paradox and also the Short Trips stories, which used to be basic skeleton articles before I got my head down and added to them. [[The End]], [[Osskah]] and [[Museum Peace]] are some of the best examples of this.
 
On my understanding of Doctor Who i can only detail what i have read, listened to etc.
*All 8th Doctor comics and audios
*30+ EDA books
*First Frontier and the Dying Days from the NA's and The Dark Path from MA's
*Around 10 PDA's
*All 5th Doctor comics
*Listened to all Faction Paradox audios and read most of the Book of the War (a killer that one)
*Up to Death and the Daleks in BFBS series and they are next on my list for listening
*Most of the monthly BFA releases
*Most classic Who, listened to soundtracks of most missing episodes
*And of course all new Who, Torchwood and Sarah Jane TV episodes
Theres probably more to list but i'd rather not list them all.
 
I think it is up to you to determine how trustworthy i am but as you know i revert vandalism often and try to prevent vandals from doing further damage with formal warnings of procedure. My interaction with other users is fair and i account for other user's views of things and not just my own.
 
If there is anything else that i may have missed please let me know and i will try to answer for you. --[[User:Revanvolatrelundar|Revan]]\[[User talk:Revanvolatrelundar|Talk]] 15:45, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
 
It is because at the moment i have been editing on topics that are very popular on the wikia and there is usually a large number of editors trying to get their say at the same time. This means that by the time I have got something down there is an edit conflict which means i have to type up again, hence the rushed typing and errors. --[[User:Revanvolatrelundar|Revan]]\[[User talk:Revanvolatrelundar|Talk]] 15:40, February 1, 2011 (UTC)
 
==== Support ====
#Frequent user. Good opinions. Great edits. What more can one say?--[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small> 16:30, February 2, 2011 (UTC)
 
==== Neutral ====
 
==== Oppose ====
====Comment and Questions====
=== [[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]] ===
I am a frequent user of this wiki and have many contributions. I would like to be an admin so as to have the powers to prevent and delete vandalism.
 
The edits I am most proud of are the following and their related pages: [[Delta and the Bannermen]], [[The Banquo Legacy]] (in particular [[Banquo Manor]]) and [[Frobisher]]. Most of my edits concern the classic series, but I also (less frequently) edit those of the [[BBC Wales]] series.--[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small> 16:22, February 2, 2011 (UTC)
 
==== Support ====
*Skittles is a experienced member with a detailed knowledge of Doctor Who, his services to the quality of the wikia come at the highest standard. A sure candidate for administration. --[[User:Revanvolatrelundar|Revan]]\[[User_talk:Revanvolatrelundar|Talk]] 16:26, February 2, 2011 (UTC)
==== Neutral ====
 
==== Oppose ====
 
====Comment and Questions====
 
=== [[User:CzechOut]] ===
I request admin status chiefly because one of my main editing interests in is template and site design, and things have simply come to the point where I need access to [[MediaWiki:Wikia.css]] and similar, admin-only files. We don't really have an admin whose focus is coding and technical support, and we desperately need one if we want our site to modernize. Most of the templates on this site currently involve coding either wholly created or majorly adapted by me. For those unfamiliar, templates like {{tl|timeline}}, {{tl|wales crew}}, {{tl|discontinuity}}, and most of the [[:category:main page templates|main page templates]] and [[:category:coding utility templates|coding utility templates]] are amongst my technical innovations to the site.
 
I've taken a few steps towards creating a total makeover for this wiki by creating [[w:c:tardistest]], a sort of "showcase" wiki for changes to the underlying code. Tardis Test will persist, even if I'm offered adminship, as we'll naturally want major changes to get approval in forum discussions. I've not yet finished what I call the "New Tardis Blue (or NTB) facelift", but you can see the direction I'm heading by going to the TardisTest wiki and clicking on the "What's changed" tab.
 
I'm also the only user currently operating a bot onsite, and have performed tens of thousands of minor edits which help the site adhere to its own [[tardis:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]]. It would be helpful to admins if that bot were also granted admin rights so that it could just delete things outright, rather than needlessly cluttering up the proposed deletions category with categories that then have to be deleted by hand by an admin. (Admin are entirely superflous to a bot category deletion; admin can't easily undo a bot category switch. Only a bot can. So the bot might as well have the power to delete categories outright, since categories rarely have a significant revision history to preserve.) I'm also responsible for the massive overhaul of the category tree system that's happened underneath the surface of the wiki over the last year.
 
Beyond that, I'm not really interested in blowin' my own horn, but I think that's exactly what's required by the instructions on how to apply for adminship.
 
Although I want adminship for a very technical and limited reason, I think I'd be a good choice even if I didn't have coding skills.
 
I've edited significantly in every namespace, though by far most of my edits are good, old fashioned, substantive edits in main. I've lost count of how many new pages I've added, but it's a lot. I have a particular passion for behind-the-scenes pages, and I think that I've done a lot to make sure that most people who have been credited on ''Doctor Who'' have some sort of representation here. A lot of the ~1000 photos I've added to the site have been of behind-the-scenes personnel, and I noted last year on GallifreyBase that fans who participated in "location spying" turned to some of my additions here in order to identify crew members they'd spotted on locations. I really enjoy discovering things about behind-the-scenes figures by fleshing out articles, such as happened with [[Christine Rawlins]], [[James Acheson]], [[Bill Paterson]], the [[hairstylist]] on the TVM (whose name I've forgotten), and a heck of a lot of the [[visual effects supervisor]]s. I also dig writing leads for story pages.
 
In-universe editing interests recently include:
*a dedication to improving the coverage of the [[United States of America]] in advance of the very American opening of series 6
*things broadly in [[:Category:Cultural references from the real world]]; I don't know why, but I love that ''[[Strictly Come Dancing]]'' and ''[[Breakfast at Tiffany's]]'' are things [[Martha Jones]] knows about, for instance.
*improving articles about regular television characters that somehow got neglected here (I'm particularly proud of [[Mel]] and mostly happy with [[Susan]] and some sections of the [[Polly Wright]] article)
 
That said, though, I've at one time or another been interested in a lot of in-universe things, and you'll tend to find a lot of weird little categories around where I'm the only author. (Not in-universe, but [[:category:recording formats]] is one such example.)
 
I think I'm also good about using the forum or talk pages in order to solicit opinion, and I feel like I'm committed to consensus decision making. I'd challenge ya to find an active editor who's used the fora and talk pages ''more''; 10½% of my edits — or about 1720 of my total edits — have so far been devoted to talk pages or the forums. That demonstrates an above-average commitment to communication and consultation, unmatched by even current admin. Of course, that's sometimes been a double-edged sword, as I tend to be very forceful, even as I'm seeking compromise.
 
At any rate, most of this has been rather incidental to the main request, which is pretty simple. We don't have an admin who cares that much about CSS, JavaScript and bot use. We need one. So I'd appreciate your support. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}
 
==== Support ====
*Super editor, knows the inside and out of this wikia. When i started the wikia i was shocked when i found out he wasn't an admin. --[[User:Revanvolatrelundar|Revan]]\[[User_talk:Revanvolatrelundar|Talk]] 20:37, February 2, 2011 (UTC)
#Agreed. Czech is a great editor, even if I think he's a little of an overachiver. :) --[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:blue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 20:43, February 2, 2011 (UTC)
 
==== Neutral ====
 
==== Oppose ====
 
====Comment and Questions====


==Bureaucrats==
== Bureaucrats ==
A bureaucrat has the same rights as an administrator and the additional permission to create new administrators and bureaucrats.
A bureaucrat has the same rights as an administrator and the additional permission to create new administrators and bureaucrats.


Nominations:
Nominations:


[[Category:TARDIS Index File Wiki]]
[[Category:Nomination pages|*]]
[[Category:How do I become an admin?]]

Latest revision as of 07:53, 28 March 2024

Please put nominations (including self-nominations) for special user rights below. Do so by using the following format. Please cut and paste the entirety of this format, and put it underneath the most recent nominee in the section. Where the format says "UserName", please ensure you change it to their actual user name.

===[[Special:Contributions/UserName|UserName]]===
:'''The rationale for nominating this user is:'''
====Support====
:'''Please outline the reasons you support this nomination below:''' 
====Oppose====
:'''Why do you oppose this nomination?'''
====Neutral====
:'''Feeling lukewarm about this user?  Tell us why.'''
====Comments and concerns====
:'''Do you have specific concerns about this user that are getting in the way of you making up your mind?  Leave them here for the nominee to address.'''  To the nominee: failure to respond to comments left here may weigh against you when it comes time to close the nomination.

Adjustments may be made for special circumstances, but in general there will be at least a one week comment period.

See How do I become an admin? for additional questions and information on administrator roles on the Tardis Data Core Doctor Who Wiki. For more general information about becoming an administrator see Community Central - Tips for becoming an admin

For more information on these roles see Help:User access levels. Special:Listusers/sysop shows the current admins, bureaucrats and staff IDs.


Admins[[edit source]]

An administrator has special responsibilities to watch over the wiki. In order to make it easier to fulfill those responsibilities, and admin can block user IDs or IP edits, protect pages and revert pages more easily.

Nominations:

Bureaucrats[[edit source]]

A bureaucrat has the same rights as an administrator and the additional permission to create new administrators and bureaucrats.

Nominations: