68,223
edits
More actions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
::::::On the other hand, at least one article ([[Rod of Rassilon]]) is in the non-existent Artifacts category. | ::::::On the other hand, at least one article ([[Rod of Rassilon]]) is in the non-existent Artifacts category. | ||
::::::Doesn't [[The Invasion of Time]] specifically refer to Gallifreyan art(i|e)facts? If so, maybe we could look for the official subtitles for that and/or the novelization. If it agrees with Shada, we're set. If not... someadmin can make a judgment call and we make them all consistent, I guess? Either way, we probably need add redirects for the other spelling. --[[User:Falcotron|Falcotron]] 21:01, June 3, 2010 (UTC) | ::::::Doesn't [[The Invasion of Time]] specifically refer to Gallifreyan art(i|e)facts? If so, maybe we could look for the official subtitles for that and/or the novelization. If it agrees with Shada, we're set. If not... someadmin can make a judgment call and we make them all consistent, I guess? Either way, we probably need add redirects for the other spelling. --[[User:Falcotron|Falcotron]] 21:01, June 3, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::::::Here was I thinking this was an easy fix. | |||
:::::::Artefact is an Australian usage, according to my 'The Australian Concise English Dictionary', it does list 'artifact' but just says 'see artefact'. | |||
:::::::I would prefer to go with text based sources for this one ''and'' have the subtitles to back it up (after all the subtitles spell TARDIS 'Tardis'). --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 12:27, June 7, 2010 (UTC) | |||