Forum:Rumours on the loose: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Updating links from Series 6 (Doctor Who) to Series 6 (Doctor Who 2005)) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{archive|Panopticon archives}}[[Category:Out of date]] | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
I keep on noticing different things with the word rumoured in it on the [[Series 6 (Doctor Who)|Series 6]] page, OUTSIDE the section appropriatly named rumours. I mean, in Episode Notes it says: | I keep on noticing different things with the word rumoured in it on the [[Series 6 (Doctor Who 2005)|Series 6]] page, OUTSIDE the section appropriatly named rumours. I mean, in Episode Notes it says: | ||
*A rumoured synopsis of ''Rebel Flesh ''and ''Gangers'' has been released.......... | *A rumoured synopsis of ''Rebel Flesh ''and ''Gangers'' has been released.......... | ||
*It is rumoured that Series 6 will begin on the 9th April 2011 | *It is rumoured that Series 6 will begin on the 9th April 2011 | ||
Latest revision as of 19:54, 25 April 2024
I keep on noticing different things with the word rumoured in it on the Series 6 page, OUTSIDE the section appropriatly named rumours. I mean, in Episode Notes it says:
- A rumoured synopsis of Rebel Flesh and Gangers has been released..........
- It is rumoured that Series 6 will begin on the 9th April 2011
and on Episodes it says:
- Night Terrors (rumoured)
I mean, this is just silly. Rumours belong where rumours are supposed to be. I thought this was in the policy. Please can an admin just delete them because I bet that if I did it, I would get murdered, so really, please just make it clear that you CAN'T add rumours where rumours aren't supposed to be..... If I got the policy stuff wrong, you can murder me. Oh no, you're gonna ban me for saying that.
Ghastly9090 16:02, February 21, 2011 (UTC)
I don't really see a discussion here. Just statements. Tidy it up if it getting overrun.----Skittles the hog--Talk 16:11, February 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Could you please expand a bit on your thoughts, Ghastly? I'm not quite understanding what you'd like for admin to do that you can't. I mean, I agree that the things you're finding are wrong — rumours shouldn't be out of their section — but I'm not sure why you're feeling you can't make the edits yourself. You have the full weight of tardis:spoiler policy#rumours behind you. Who's going to "murder" you?
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍
- Could you please expand a bit on your thoughts, Ghastly? I'm not quite understanding what you'd like for admin to do that you can't. I mean, I agree that the things you're finding are wrong — rumours shouldn't be out of their section — but I'm not sure why you're feeling you can't make the edits yourself. You have the full weight of tardis:spoiler policy#rumours behind you. Who's going to "murder" you?
I think others users have since cleared this up. It could be better but pre-broadcast pages do eventually improve.----Skittles the hog--Talk 19:36, February 22, 2011 (UTC)
