User talk:CodeAndGin: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(→Re:T:BOUND: new section) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Ah, I also remembered [[Thread:278448]] at [[User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon IV]]. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 01:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | :Ah, I also remembered [[Thread:278448]] at [[User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon IV]]. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 01:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | ||
::Scrooge performed the merger in April 2021 when the forums were down, but merged [[Joan Redfern]] at the same time. See Nate's comment on [[Talk:Joan Redfern]], I guess? That's all I have off hand. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 01:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | ::Scrooge performed the merger in April 2021 when the forums were down, but merged [[Joan Redfern]] at the same time. See Nate's comment on [[Talk:Joan Redfern]], I guess? That's all I have off hand. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 01:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | ||
== Re:T:BOUND == | |||
See paragraph 5 of [[T:BOUND]]. | |||
:''Contrariwise'', this sometimes applies to things which have ''not'' actually been written anywhere (yet). Ideally, [[Tardis:Who writes policy|all past decisions and current practice ''should'' be written into explicit policy]], but nobody's perfect. It makes sense to have a policy that says "even if the current setup isn't codified by a specific policy, you shouldn't, on a whim, try and implement a change that would have ramifications on thousands of pages without starting a discussion". So, in the above policy, '''the word "policy" doesn't just apply to those decisions that have been officially enshrined through discussion, but also refers to operating procedures that apply to multiple pages over large periods of time with the express knowledge of admins''', even if these procedures technically contradict the results of a previous forum decision. Try not to make large scale changes to the wiki without opening a discussion about these changes first. | |||
Or [[Forum:Temporary forums/T:BOUND Reform]] for more. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:39, 25 April 2024
Just to help
You might want to read T:HOMEWORLD and Thread:209869 in User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon III, which serves as relevant precedent, if you haven't already, given your sandbox. Cheers. Najawin ☎ 23:12, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, I also remembered Thread:278448 at User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon IV. Najawin ☎ 01:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Scrooge performed the merger in April 2021 when the forums were down, but merged Joan Redfern at the same time. See Nate's comment on Talk:Joan Redfern, I guess? That's all I have off hand. Najawin ☎ 01:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Re:T:BOUND
See paragraph 5 of T:BOUND.
- Contrariwise, this sometimes applies to things which have not actually been written anywhere (yet). Ideally, all past decisions and current practice should be written into explicit policy, but nobody's perfect. It makes sense to have a policy that says "even if the current setup isn't codified by a specific policy, you shouldn't, on a whim, try and implement a change that would have ramifications on thousands of pages without starting a discussion". So, in the above policy, the word "policy" doesn't just apply to those decisions that have been officially enshrined through discussion, but also refers to operating procedures that apply to multiple pages over large periods of time with the express knowledge of admins, even if these procedures technically contradict the results of a previous forum decision. Try not to make large scale changes to the wiki without opening a discussion about these changes first.
Or Forum:Temporary forums/T:BOUND Reform for more. Najawin ☎ 20:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
