283
edits
CodeAndGin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(→Bump) |
||
Line 359: | Line 359: | ||
::Just bumping again now the fork has occurred to get an official ruling on this [[User:Hasrock36|Hasrock36]] [[User talk:Hasrock36|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 10:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC) | ::Just bumping again now the fork has occurred to get an official ruling on this [[User:Hasrock36|Hasrock36]] [[User talk:Hasrock36|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 10:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC) | ||
::: +1 on we need an official ruling. I didn't toss my two cents in during the bulk of the discussion as I was still largely a lurker, but since I've started engaging with editing a little more, I'd like to add my piece. Removal of the deadname in its entirety on moral grounds would almost certainly be a big NPOV violation. That said, that would still be the route I'd be most in favour of. Otherwise, documentation of the facts, couched in content warnings, BTS explanations, and {{tlx|hidden text}} would be my next preferred option. In a different, more perfect world, the article as it stands would be probably basically fine, but we live in a world filled with rampant, rising transphobia, a media machine fanning the flames, and governments actively legislating against trans people's existence. We should, as a community, actively stand against this in our policy and direction of coverage, in my opinion. We do, insofar as RW coverage is concerned ([[T:ACTOR]]); We should reflect that attitude across our whole coverage. - [[User:CodeAndGin|<span style="color:green" title="CodeAndGin">CodeAndGin</span>]] | [[User_talk:CodeAndGin|<span title="Talk to me">🗨</span>]] | 15:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC) | ::: +1 on we need an official ruling. I didn't toss my two cents in during the bulk of the discussion as I was still largely a lurker, but since I've started engaging with editing a little more, I'd like to add my piece. Removal of the deadname in its entirety on moral grounds would almost certainly be a big NPOV violation. That said, that would still be the route I'd be most in favour of. Otherwise, documentation of the facts, couched in content warnings, BTS explanations, and {{tlx|hidden text}} would be my next preferred option. In a different, more perfect world, the article as it stands would be probably basically fine, but we live in a world filled with rampant, rising transphobia, a media machine fanning the flames, and governments actively legislating against trans people's existence. We should, as a community, actively stand against this in our policy and direction of coverage, in my opinion. We do, insofar as RW coverage is concerned ([[T:ACTOR]]); We should reflect that attitude across our whole coverage. - [[User:CodeAndGin|<span style="color:green" title="CodeAndGin">CodeAndGin</span>]] | [[User_talk:CodeAndGin|<span title="Talk to me">🗨</span>]] | 15:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC) | ||
::::I would also like to say that this I do think needs closing I have made my statements and I still stand by them I do think that this is very important and that Moral and Policy perspectives should both be taken into account whilst I lean slightly more towards the Moral points I still think policy a NPOV should be taken into consideration even if in the end they are disregarded--[[User:Anastasia Cousins|Anastasia Cousins]] [[User talk:Anastasia Cousins|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:32, 1 May 2024 (UTC) |
edits