Forum:Validity: AU games: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 3: Line 3:
Just shining a light on these old online games which, as I understand it, were only ever invalid because they twisted the events of certain episodes (I believe these are all of them), {{cs|The Last Dalek (video game)|The Last Dalek}}, {{cs|Slitheen Surfer (video game)}}, {{cs|K9: Deja Who (video game)}} and {{cs|Daleks v Cybermen (video game)}}. [[User:MrThermomanPreacher|MrThermomanPreacher]] [[User talk:MrThermomanPreacher|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Just shining a light on these old online games which, as I understand it, were only ever invalid because they twisted the events of certain episodes (I believe these are all of them), {{cs|The Last Dalek (video game)|The Last Dalek}}, {{cs|Slitheen Surfer (video game)}}, {{cs|K9: Deja Who (video game)}} and {{cs|Daleks v Cybermen (video game)}}. [[User:MrThermomanPreacher|MrThermomanPreacher]] [[User talk:MrThermomanPreacher|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
:: Also including the [[Cybusman]] campaign of {{cs|Cyber Assault (video game)}}. --[[User:MrThermomanPreacher|MrThermomanPreacher]] [[User talk:MrThermomanPreacher|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:13, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
:: Also including the [[Cybusman]] campaign of {{cs|Cyber Assault (video game)}}. --[[User:MrThermomanPreacher|MrThermomanPreacher]] [[User talk:MrThermomanPreacher|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:13, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
== Discussion ==
I'm unsure on validating the stories - do they actually pass rule 4 (intent), whether as alternate timelines, parallel universes, or simply alternate accounts of events? I'm not too sure that "the Doctor dies during the events of ''Dalek''" is intended to be a valid alternate series of events, but I'm not certain either way. [[User:Cookieboy 2005|Cookieboy 2005]] [[User talk:Cookieboy 2005|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:14, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:14, 23 September 2024

IndexInclusion debates → Validity: AU games
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.

Just shining a light on these old online games which, as I understand it, were only ever invalid because they twisted the events of certain episodes (I believe these are all of them), The Last Dalek [+]Loading...["The Last Dalek (video game)","The Last Dalek"], Slitheen Surfer [+]Loading...["Slitheen Surfer (video game)"], K9: Deja Who [+]Loading...["K9: Deja Who (video game)"] and Daleks v Cybermen [+]Loading...["Daleks v Cybermen (video game)"]. MrThermomanPreacher 17:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Also including the Cybusman campaign of Cyber Assault [+]Loading...["Cyber Assault (video game)"]. --MrThermomanPreacher 15:13, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Discussion[[edit source]]

I'm unsure on validating the stories - do they actually pass rule 4 (intent), whether as alternate timelines, parallel universes, or simply alternate accounts of events? I'm not too sure that "the Doctor dies during the events of Dalek" is intended to be a valid alternate series of events, but I'm not certain either way. Cookieboy 2005 16:14, 23 September 2024 (UTC)