Talk:Chitauri: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Created page with "== Infobox == Is it worth having the infobox image if it, a) doesn't depict the article's subject and, b) is longer than the article itself? ~~~~") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Infobox == | == Infobox == | ||
Is it worth having the infobox image if it, a) doesn't depict the article's subject and, b) is longer than the article itself? [[User:Jack|Jack]] [[User talk:Jack|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:09, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | Is it worth having the infobox image if it, a) doesn't depict the article's subject and, b) is longer than the article itself? [[User:Jack|Jack]] [[User talk:Jack|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:09, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
: I've been using infobox images of elements being mentioned, with an explanatory caption, on a fair few articles (e.g. [[Wile E. Coyote]]), so I do personally think they're more helpful than ''not'' having them. As for the image's height, that's just because the panel it's from is vertical, although it probably ''could'' be cropped a bit shorter, since Rocket's not overly important to the image. [[User:Cookieboy 2005|Cookieboy 2005]] [[User talk:Cookieboy 2005|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:15, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:15, 18 October 2024
Infobox
Is it worth having the infobox image if it, a) doesn't depict the article's subject and, b) is longer than the article itself? Jack ☎ 20:09, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- I've been using infobox images of elements being mentioned, with an explanatory caption, on a fair few articles (e.g. Wile E. Coyote), so I do personally think they're more helpful than not having them. As for the image's height, that's just because the panel it's from is vertical, although it probably could be cropped a bit shorter, since Rocket's not overly important to the image. Cookieboy 2005 ☎ 20:15, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
