Forum:Rumours on the loose: Difference between revisions
GhastlyKhaos (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Forumheader|Panopticon}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> I keep on noticing different things with the word ...") |
m (Bot: Replacing category Out of date with Out-of-date discussions) Tag: thread closure |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{archive|Panopticon archives}} | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
I keep on noticing different things with the word rumoured in it on the [[Series 6 (Doctor Who)|Series 6]] page, OUTSIDE the section appropriatly named rumours. I mean, in Episode Notes it says: | I keep on noticing different things with the word rumoured in it on the [[Series 6 (Doctor Who 2005)|Series 6]] page, OUTSIDE the section appropriatly named rumours. I mean, in Episode Notes it says: | ||
*A rumoured synopsis of ''Rebel Flesh ''and ''Gangers'' has been released.......... | *A rumoured synopsis of ''Rebel Flesh ''and ''Gangers'' has been released.......... | ||
*It is rumoured that Series 6 will begin on the 9th April 2011 | *It is rumoured that Series 6 will begin on the 9th April 2011 | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
[[User:Ghastly9090|Ghastly9090]] 16:02, February 21, 2011 (UTC) | [[User:Ghastly9090|Ghastly9090]] 16:02, February 21, 2011 (UTC) | ||
I don't really see a discussion here. Just statements. Tidy it up if it getting overrun.----[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small> 16:11, February 21, 2011 (UTC) | |||
::Could you please expand a bit on your thoughts, Ghastly? I'm not quite understanding what you'd like for admin to do that you can't. I mean, I agree that the things you're finding are wrong — rumours shouldn't be out of their section — but I'm not sure why you're feeling you can't make the edits yourself. You have the full weight of [[tardis:spoiler policy#rumours]] behind you. Who's going to "murder" you? {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} | |||
I think others users have since cleared this up. It could be better but pre-broadcast pages do eventually improve.----[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small> 19:36, February 22, 2011 (UTC) | |||
[[Category:Out-of-date discussions]] | |||
Latest revision as of 00:52, 18 November 2024
I keep on noticing different things with the word rumoured in it on the Series 6 page, OUTSIDE the section appropriatly named rumours. I mean, in Episode Notes it says:
- A rumoured synopsis of Rebel Flesh and Gangers has been released..........
- It is rumoured that Series 6 will begin on the 9th April 2011
and on Episodes it says:
- Night Terrors (rumoured)
I mean, this is just silly. Rumours belong where rumours are supposed to be. I thought this was in the policy. Please can an admin just delete them because I bet that if I did it, I would get murdered, so really, please just make it clear that you CAN'T add rumours where rumours aren't supposed to be..... If I got the policy stuff wrong, you can murder me. Oh no, you're gonna ban me for saying that.
Ghastly9090 16:02, February 21, 2011 (UTC)
I don't really see a discussion here. Just statements. Tidy it up if it getting overrun.----Skittles the hog--Talk 16:11, February 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Could you please expand a bit on your thoughts, Ghastly? I'm not quite understanding what you'd like for admin to do that you can't. I mean, I agree that the things you're finding are wrong — rumours shouldn't be out of their section — but I'm not sure why you're feeling you can't make the edits yourself. You have the full weight of tardis:spoiler policy#rumours behind you. Who's going to "murder" you?
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍
- Could you please expand a bit on your thoughts, Ghastly? I'm not quite understanding what you'd like for admin to do that you can't. I mean, I agree that the things you're finding are wrong — rumours shouldn't be out of their section — but I'm not sure why you're feeling you can't make the edits yourself. You have the full weight of tardis:spoiler policy#rumours behind you. Who's going to "murder" you?
I think others users have since cleared this up. It could be better but pre-broadcast pages do eventually improve.----Skittles the hog--Talk 19:36, February 22, 2011 (UTC)
