Forum:Suggested Changes to TV Story Infobox: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Bot: Replacing category Out of date with Out-of-date discussions) Tag: thread closure |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{archive|Panopticon archives}} | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
Just a couple of thoughts... | Just a couple of thoughts... | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
What do we think? | What do we think? | ||
--[[User:Mantrid|Mantrid]] 07:52, 3 September 2006 (UTC) | --[[User:Mantrid|Mantrid]] 07:52, 3 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
:Hmm, and listing them in the infobox would get problematic for "[[The Daleks' Master Plan]]." Storylinks in the infobox would at least make for easier edits. | |||
--[[User:Freethinker1of1|Freethinker1of1]] 22:46, 4 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
==Archivist's notes== | |||
Mantrid's suggestion did carry the day, but the day was so long ago, this thread probably doesn't make much sense to modern users of the site. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}'''14:15:12 Mon '''30 May 2011 </span> | |||
[[Category:Out-of-date discussions]] |
Latest revision as of 00:53, 18 November 2024
Just a couple of thoughts...
Firstly, do we really need to list all the individual episode titles for the Hartnell stories under the 'Format' section of the infobox? As the plot details are added for each story all the titles will show up in the navigation box anyway.
Secondly, I'm beginning to think that it would be more useful to have the previous and next story links at the bottom of the infobox rather than at the bottom of the page.
What do we think?
--Mantrid 07:52, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- Hmm, and listing them in the infobox would get problematic for "The Daleks' Master Plan." Storylinks in the infobox would at least make for easier edits.
--Freethinker1of1 22:46, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Archivist's notes[[edit source]]
Mantrid's suggestion did carry the day, but the day was so long ago, this thread probably doesn't make much sense to modern users of the site.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 14:15:12 Mon 30 May 2011