Forum:Continuity Question: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Bigshowbower (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{Forumheader|Panopticon}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> I have been going through the New Series, Disconin…') |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-Category:Out-of-date forum discussions +Category:Out-of-date discussions)) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{archive|Panopticon archives}} | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
I have been going through the New Series, Disconinuity, Plot Holes and Errors section and have found that there were mentions of events that occured in either the novels or the audio story, statments in that section seem to be contridicting either the episode or the novel/audio story, what is the policy regarding novel/audio story contunity and Television episode continuity? [[User:Bigshowbower|Bigshowbower]] 11:57, September 5, 2009 (UTC) | I have been going through the New Series, Disconinuity, Plot Holes and Errors section and have found that there were mentions of events that occured in either the novels or the audio story, statments in that section seem to be contridicting either the episode or the novel/audio story, what is the policy regarding novel/audio story contunity and Television episode continuity? [[User:Bigshowbower|Bigshowbower]] 11:57, September 5, 2009 (UTC) | ||
:The specific wording in the Manual of style defines the section as "Plot holes, continuity conflicts with other stories, and bloopers which got past the editing process all go here." | |||
:So any continuity conflicts can be presented, but any discussion should take place in [[Howling:The Howling]]. | |||
:Additionally as far as the explanations go, there shouldn't be any that postulate on things ie anything with phrases like 'probably' or 'it's possible' or 'maybe', anything like this can be removed easily (hopefully this eradicates some issues). --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 16:38, September 5, 2009 (UTC) | |||
==Archivist's notes== | |||
All this has been superseded by the creation of [[Forum:Discontinuity index]]. Basically, ignore this whole thread. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}'''17:23:57 Fri '''27 May 2011 </span> | |||
[[Category:Out-of-date discussions]] | |||
Latest revision as of 00:55, 18 November 2024
Forums → Archive index → Panopticon archives → Continuity Question
I have been going through the New Series, Disconinuity, Plot Holes and Errors section and have found that there were mentions of events that occured in either the novels or the audio story, statments in that section seem to be contridicting either the episode or the novel/audio story, what is the policy regarding novel/audio story contunity and Television episode continuity? Bigshowbower 11:57, September 5, 2009 (UTC)
- The specific wording in the Manual of style defines the section as "Plot holes, continuity conflicts with other stories, and bloopers which got past the editing process all go here."
- So any continuity conflicts can be presented, but any discussion should take place in Howling:The Howling.
- Additionally as far as the explanations go, there shouldn't be any that postulate on things ie anything with phrases like 'probably' or 'it's possible' or 'maybe', anything like this can be removed easily (hopefully this eradicates some issues). --Tangerineduel 16:38, September 5, 2009 (UTC)
Archivist's notes[[edit source]]
All this has been superseded by the creation of Forum:Discontinuity index. Basically, ignore this whole thread.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 17:23:57 Fri 27 May 2011
