Forum:Rumours on the loose: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Created page with "{{Forumheader|Panopticon}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> I keep on noticing different things with the word ...")
 
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:


[[User:Ghastly9090|Ghastly9090]] 16:02, February 21, 2011 (UTC)
[[User:Ghastly9090|Ghastly9090]] 16:02, February 21, 2011 (UTC)
I don't really see a discussion here. Just statements. Tidy it up if it getting overrun.----[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small> 16:11, February 21, 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:11, 21 February 2011

IndexPanopticon → Rumours on the loose
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.


I keep on noticing different things with the word rumoured in it on the Series 6 page, OUTSIDE the section appropriatly named rumours. I mean, in Episode Notes it says:

  • A rumoured synopsis of Rebel Flesh and Gangers has been released..........
  • It is rumoured that Series 6 will begin on the 9th April 2011

and on Episodes it says:

  • Night Terrors (rumoured)

I mean, this is just silly. Rumours belong where rumours are supposed to be. I thought this was in the policy. Please can an admin just delete them because I bet that if I did it, I would get murdered, so really, please just make it clear that you CAN'T add rumours where rumours aren't supposed to be..... If I got the policy stuff wrong, you can murder me. Oh no, you're gonna ban me for saying that.


Ghastly9090 16:02, February 21, 2011 (UTC)

I don't really see a discussion here. Just statements. Tidy it up if it getting overrun.----Skittles the hog--Talk 16:11, February 21, 2011 (UTC)