Forum:Rumours on the loose: Difference between revisions
GhastlyKhaos (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Forumheader|Panopticon}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> I keep on noticing different things with the word ...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
[[User:Ghastly9090|Ghastly9090]] 16:02, February 21, 2011 (UTC) | [[User:Ghastly9090|Ghastly9090]] 16:02, February 21, 2011 (UTC) | ||
I don't really see a discussion here. Just statements. Tidy it up if it getting overrun.----[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small> 16:11, February 21, 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:11, 21 February 2011
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
I keep on noticing different things with the word rumoured in it on the Series 6 page, OUTSIDE the section appropriatly named rumours. I mean, in Episode Notes it says:
- A rumoured synopsis of Rebel Flesh and Gangers has been released..........
- It is rumoured that Series 6 will begin on the 9th April 2011
and on Episodes it says:
- Night Terrors (rumoured)
I mean, this is just silly. Rumours belong where rumours are supposed to be. I thought this was in the policy. Please can an admin just delete them because I bet that if I did it, I would get murdered, so really, please just make it clear that you CAN'T add rumours where rumours aren't supposed to be..... If I got the policy stuff wrong, you can murder me. Oh no, you're gonna ban me for saying that.
Ghastly9090 16:02, February 21, 2011 (UTC)
I don't really see a discussion here. Just statements. Tidy it up if it getting overrun.----Skittles the hog--Talk 16:11, February 21, 2011 (UTC)