User talk:StefanDurn: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(welcoming new contributor)
 
(→‎Season 6: new section)
Line 38: Line 38:
Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the [[Tardis:Help| Help pages]], add a question to one of [[Forum:Index|the Forums]] or ask on my user talk page.  
Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the [[Tardis:Help| Help pages]], add a question to one of [[Forum:Index|the Forums]] or ask on my user talk page.  
</div>
</div>
== Season 6 ==
I can't remember what your exact edit was so I will just spout a few pointers. What you've got to make sure of is that you source all info on a wiki. To reference a rumour or fact on the [[Series 6 (Doctor Who)]] page simply add <nowiki>the url between these two codes.</nowiki> There isn't anything specifically wrong with images, they were just a bit untidy (as I recall you added a gallery that kind of screwed the text up). Hope this helped, and good look with future edits.----[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small> 18:33, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:33, 3 April 2011

Welcome to the Tardis:About StefanDurn!

We hope you'll enjoy being a part of our community! If you're new to either us or wiki editing in general, you might want to check out some of these links:

We only take the best!
  • Internal pages
  • External Wikipedia pages
Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes like this:
~~~~

Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the Help pages, add a question to one of the Forums or ask on my user talk page.

Season 6

I can't remember what your exact edit was so I will just spout a few pointers. What you've got to make sure of is that you source all info on a wiki. To reference a rumour or fact on the Series 6 (Doctor Who) page simply add the url between these two codes. There isn't anything specifically wrong with images, they were just a bit untidy (as I recall you added a gallery that kind of screwed the text up). Hope this helped, and good look with future edits.----Skittles the hog--Talk 18:33, April 3, 2011 (UTC)