Talk:Sarah Jane Smith: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
(→‎Fate: new section)
Line 36: Line 36:
==Beetle==
==Beetle==
"''Sarah owned a beetle called Edith, which was blown up''" - it's not entirely clear from the text whether this was a Volkswagen Beetle or a beetle-beetle. Which was it? -[[User:Ashley Pomeroy|Ashley Pomeroy]] 17:47, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
"''Sarah owned a beetle called Edith, which was blown up''" - it's not entirely clear from the text whether this was a Volkswagen Beetle or a beetle-beetle. Which was it? -[[User:Ashley Pomeroy|Ashley Pomeroy]] 17:47, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
== Fate ==
With Elisabeth Sladen dead now, the production crew will have to think of a way to either keep Sarah going, or get rid of her. The most logical thing to do is 2-fold:
#Get a new actress (there's plenty of hopefuls out there)
#End her life off-screen (Remember Mr. Hooper?)
Another thing I thought of was having Sarah Jane have a day job, leaving Luke, Clyde, Rani & K9 to their adventures.
The best thing to do is cancel "Sarah Jane Adventures", but have Sarah Jane live on in the comics & novels (that's how previous Doctor's live on).
Finally, how about give replacing Sarah Jane with Jo Grant? She's just as popular, and with her more recent guest spot on SJA, she still has potential!
So, those are some ideas for the Sarah Jane Smith character. GODZILLA RULZ! 23:44, April 19, 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:44, 19 April 2011

SJA's (non-)membership in UNIT

Just a note that even though Sarah Jane was not an official member of UNIT, it was during the Doctor's years with the organization that she served as his companion, so I'm including her under the "United Nations Intelligence Taskforce" category. --Freethinker1of1 04:54, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Reasons for the Doctor's not taking her to Gallifrey

Was ever explained why the Doctor felt/said that he couldn't take her with him to Gallifrey? I'm sorry, I haven't seen the episode, and I don't know where to look for an answer. --Treelight 17:22, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

I thought it was just because she wasn't a Time Lord. I'm not sure though, since I haven't seen the episode recently. -<Azes13 12:40, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
It was all to do with the Time Lord's non-interventionist policies. Before The Deadly Assasin they're all big on the looking down on the lower species and that kind of thing, after Assassin the society goes through a bit of a shake up (which leads to Borusa taking power). The Doctor couldn't take Sarah back to Gallifrey at that point, but obviously things moved on following Assassin, which meant he was able to take Leela and then Nyssa later on. (Don't ask me where I got this from...I'm pretty sure I've read it somewhere before).
Alternatively it could have been the telepathic message that the Doctor receives foretelling the assassination of the President.
Also, alternatively, additionally to my original statement, the last time the Doctor had his companions on Gallifrey was The War Games, and at the end of that the Time Lords wiped their memories and sent them back to where they started, so perhaps he didn't want Sarah to go through that. --Tangerineduel 12:54, 28 August 2007 (UTC)


'Aliens on Gallifrey' seems to be a bit of a political hot potato there. The Doctor's father gets in trouble for faccilitating it (The Infinity Doctors) but it's a feature of the Romana Presidency that she really liberalises things thing on that particular issue (Lungbarrow). So yes, it would seem to vary politically.

Speaking of Gallifrey, Tangerineduel, why'd you think it's worth mentioning The Ancestor Cell in the bit on changes to Sarah's timeline? I'm not saying it isn't, as there's a lot about the logic of that novel I'm unclear on, but I don't remember any of what goes on there directly effecting the 'Dust Paradox' at all.--Richard Jones 13:30, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

We need to delete...

All the 90s stuff about her getting married and having kids. Perhaps a different section for the audios/novels which contradict the TV series. Perhaps we should regard them as alternate universes.81.96.164.52 23:46, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

  • No. The general format used on this wiki is to combine all different accounts into one, except on rare occasions. 23skidoo 15:21, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Agreed we need to intertwined all sources unless they are conflicting. Dark Lord Xander 06:26, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

edited photos and made them accidentally made them vanish

don't know what happened. I sure didn't delete them on purpose. --Stardizzy2 18:08, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


Family - Brendan

Is he really an adoptive cousin? I've only seen him in K9 and Company, but I thought he was Lavinia's ward, not her adoptive son? Here (US) "ward" would just signify legal custody, not adoption or familial relationship. Is it different in the UK? Or just lack of a term way to describe the actual relationship? Or did I misremember? 216.226.176.142 15:59, September 15, 2010 (UTC)


Beetle

"Sarah owned a beetle called Edith, which was blown up" - it's not entirely clear from the text whether this was a Volkswagen Beetle or a beetle-beetle. Which was it? -Ashley Pomeroy 17:47, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

Fate

With Elisabeth Sladen dead now, the production crew will have to think of a way to either keep Sarah going, or get rid of her. The most logical thing to do is 2-fold:

  1. Get a new actress (there's plenty of hopefuls out there)
  2. End her life off-screen (Remember Mr. Hooper?)

Another thing I thought of was having Sarah Jane have a day job, leaving Luke, Clyde, Rani & K9 to their adventures.

The best thing to do is cancel "Sarah Jane Adventures", but have Sarah Jane live on in the comics & novels (that's how previous Doctor's live on).

Finally, how about give replacing Sarah Jane with Jo Grant? She's just as popular, and with her more recent guest spot on SJA, she still has potential!

So, those are some ideas for the Sarah Jane Smith character. GODZILLA RULZ! 23:44, April 19, 2011 (UTC)