1,805
edits
No edit summary |
Icecreamdif (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 123: | Line 123: | ||
The way I look at is much the same way I looked at the Time War: a chance for the writers to not have to be chained to the decades of continuity that came before. That doesn't mean they can't build on it, but it frees them from a) having to research niggling details to prep a story, and b) not having to burden a script with exposition about what came before. [[User:Monkey with a Gun|Monkey with a Gun]] 11:31, April 27, 2011 (UTC) | The way I look at is much the same way I looked at the Time War: a chance for the writers to not have to be chained to the decades of continuity that came before. That doesn't mean they can't build on it, but it frees them from a) having to research niggling details to prep a story, and b) not having to burden a script with exposition about what came before. [[User:Monkey with a Gun|Monkey with a Gun]] 11:31, April 27, 2011 (UTC) | ||
They don't have to erase episodes from continuity in order to avoid being chained to previous continuity. As long as new episodes don't directly conflict with old episodes, there isn't a problem. It isn't like they have to fill every episode with references to previous episodes. Long-running television shows should build upon continuity, rather than erasing it. If the previous events have been erased, than Moffat is just as bad as JJ Abrams, erasing almost all of Star Trek continuity so that he could avoid continuity errors.[[User:Icecreamdif|Icecreamdif]] 20:34, April 27, 2011 (UTC) |
edits