Howling:The Moff is messing with us!: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "seriously, though. why else would he cater to the "river song is the doctor's wife" theory by naming an episode "the doctor's wife"? i know a lot of people who used the title of ...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
seriously, though. why else would he cater to the "river song is the doctor's wife" theory by naming an episode "the doctor's wife"? i know a lot of people who used the title of the episode as PROOF that river is his wife, when in fact the word wife was never used in the episode! i know moffat didn't actually write the episode, but with all the name changes that episode went through, i don't doubt that moffat, being a producer, ordered the change in title. it really doesn't surprise me now that he's catering to the "amy is river/little girl" theory by bringing up such a line like | seriously, though. why else would he cater to the "river song is the doctor's wife" theory by naming an episode "the doctor's wife"? i know a lot of people who used the title of the episode as PROOF that river is his wife, when in fact the word wife was never used in the episode! i know moffat didn't actually write the episode, but with all the name changes that episode went through, i don't doubt that moffat, being a producer, ordered the change in title. it really doesn't surprise me now that he's catering to the "amy is river/little girl" theory by bringing up such a line like "the only water in the forest is a river" or whatever! now i know moffat didn't write the episode but he could have, under the title of head writer, tweaked the script up a bit to conform it to the overarching plot of the series. he's just playing into the stupid conspiracies to throw us off track. | ||
the only reason i posted this was because i was tired of the same conspiracy theories over and over again...{{Forumheader|The Howling}} | the only reason i posted this was because i was tired of the same conspiracy theories over and over again...{{Forumheader|The Howling}} | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> | ||
Revision as of 01:27, 19 May 2011
seriously, though. why else would he cater to the "river song is the doctor's wife" theory by naming an episode "the doctor's wife"? i know a lot of people who used the title of the episode as PROOF that river is his wife, when in fact the word wife was never used in the episode! i know moffat didn't actually write the episode, but with all the name changes that episode went through, i don't doubt that moffat, being a producer, ordered the change in title. it really doesn't surprise me now that he's catering to the "amy is river/little girl" theory by bringing up such a line like "the only water in the forest is a river" or whatever! now i know moffat didn't write the episode but he could have, under the title of head writer, tweaked the script up a bit to conform it to the overarching plot of the series. he's just playing into the stupid conspiracies to throw us off track.
the only reason i posted this was because i was tired of the same conspiracy theories over and over again...
