Forum:Add Ganger Amy as companion in series 6

Index → Panopticon → Add Ganger Amy as companion in series 6

Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.

Beth Willis confirmed that the ganger Amy has been in with the Doctor and Rory since the beggining of series 6. So shouldn't we put Ganger Amy as the companion for the first six episodes of the series? – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Doctorpenguin (talk • contribs) .

I am over 100% agianst this. I would like to point out we will need an in-universe source to add to the articles. Also producers lie,they said no classic monsters would return in the series and that was a lie. They could be lying about this. We should wait until we get an inuniverse source, such as a TV story before we add it. Until that time, we leave it as orignal Amy. Mini-mitch\talk 22:43, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

Absolutely concur with Mini-mitch. We may not be able to make a definitive ruling on this until episode 13.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍  <span style="">00:16:38 Tue 31 May 2011 

"Ganger Amy" is Amy, with her mind/soul/consciousness inside another body. "Ganger Amy" is not a companion because she is Amy. Bigredrabbit 10:37, June 4, 2011 (UTC)

Well we can't add Amy Pond (the original) as a companion as we don't know how long she has been with the doctor for the series. We can either count both, or neither of them, as Mini-Mitches rule - we need an in universe source applys to both of them. --User:Ghastly9090/sig 15:03, June 4, 2011 (UTC)

What do you mean both or neither. Normal Pond is a companion, both from Bigredrabbit's point of view and the fact she appears at the end of The Almost People. It would be silly to change it in wake of the next episode tonight.----Skittles the hog--Talk 15:43, June 4, 2011 (UTC)

I mean there are two options. List them both as companion, or don't.--User:Ghastly9090/sig 17:24, June 4, 2011 (UTC)