Forum:Sarah Jane Adventures Wiki: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Mini-mitch (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{archive|Panopticon archives}}[[category:Inter-wiki issues]] | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
I've noticed two wikis for ''[[The Sarah Jane Adventures]]'' [[w:c:sarahjaneadventures|here]] and [[w:c:thesarahjaneadventures|here]]. Since we cover the series, I suggest we contact wikia and have both wikis made into redirects here, so that no poor soul ends up editing an empty wiki in good-faith. Since the new series just came out, we should probably be fast about it. [[User:Manga Maniac|Manga Maniac]] 20:53, October 11, 2010 (UTC) | I've noticed two wikis for ''[[The Sarah Jane Adventures]]'' [[w:c:sarahjaneadventures|here]] and [[w:c:thesarahjaneadventures|here]]. Since we cover the series, I suggest we contact wikia and have both wikis made into redirects here, so that no poor soul ends up editing an empty wiki in good-faith. Since the new series just came out, we should probably be fast about it. [[User:Manga Maniac|Manga Maniac]] 20:53, October 11, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 07:52, 5 June 2011
Forums → Archive index → Panopticon archives → Sarah Jane Adventures Wiki
I've noticed two wikis for The Sarah Jane Adventures here and here. Since we cover the series, I suggest we contact wikia and have both wikis made into redirects here, so that no poor soul ends up editing an empty wiki in good-faith. Since the new series just came out, we should probably be fast about it. Manga Maniac 20:53, October 11, 2010 (UTC)
- I wouldn't bother. There will always be duplicate wikis, and there is nothing that says they can't make them. Besides, SJA isn't our main focus, it's just something we've branched out to include as it is easier for us. Unless they're actually just copying pages from our wiki without giving citation, there isn't really a problem. --The Thirteenth Doctor 20:55, October 11, 2010 (UTC)
- For the record, another one just popped up here. Goshdarnit. Manga Maniac 20:57, October 11, 2010 (UTC)
- I have started to edit the second link, and have asked for admin rights for it. The other wiki has had no edits for a while, so I am prepared to have links to this wiki and mine and vis-versa. Any help on this wiki would be greatly appreciated at this time. I have also had to warn a User about copying directly from this wiki, so you can be assured that there will be no plagiarism done.I've just check the third one, its mainly plagiarism. Mini-mitch 20:58, October 11, 2010 (UTC)
- For the record, another one just popped up here. Goshdarnit. Manga Maniac 20:57, October 11, 2010 (UTC)
- I'll bring up the third one to one of the wikia staff. --The Thirteenth Doctor 12:25, October 12, 2010 (UTC)
- All official Doctor Who related content is our focus, but it's useful to be able to link off to a wiki that might have a tighter focus on things such as the SJA. As long as, as The Thirteenth Doctor says everything's cited there shouldn't be any issue with another wiki focusing on the SJA existing. --Tangerineduel 13:46, October 12, 2010 (UTC)
- I can say tio you now, that I have already had to warn a User about copy directly from this wiki. I reverted their edit and they have said they won't do it again. On of my current aims right now, since the wiki is in early stages that no article is just copied from this wiki. Mini-mitch 17:43, October 12, 2010 (UTC)
