Forum:Disambiguating the two Doctor Who Insiders: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
Before we get too far into the run of the ''magazine'' ''[[Doctor Who Insider]]'', we need to decide how we're going to handle the mini-documentary series on [[BBCA]], also called ''Doctor Who Insider''.  I personally think that [[tardis:disambiguation policy|disambiguation policy]] would say that they both should be disambiguated — hence [[Doctor Who Insider (magazine)]] and [[Doctor Who Insider (documentary)]].  Anyone got any particularly strong feelings in another direction?  {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''00:49:31 Tue&nbsp;'''07 Jun 2011&nbsp;</span>
Before we get too far into the run of the ''magazine'' ''[[Doctor Who Insider]]'', we need to decide how we're going to handle the mini-documentary series on [[BBCA]], also called ''Doctor Who Insider''.  I personally think that [[tardis:disambiguation policy|disambiguation policy]] would say that they both should be disambiguated — hence [[Doctor Who Insider (magazine)]] and [[Doctor Who Insider (documentary)]].  Anyone got any particularly strong feelings in another direction?  {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''00:49:31 Tue&nbsp;'''07 Jun 2011&nbsp;</span>
:The documentary series is titled "Doctor Who: Insider" (with the colon) on BBCA's official YouTube.[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQyf4oDJFQE] Perhaps that's enough for distinct articles, with the standard "you may be looking for" line atop each article pointing to the other? [[User:Rob T Firefly|Rob T Firefly]] 22:12, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
:The documentary series is titled "Doctor Who: Insider" (with the colon) on BBCA's official YouTube.[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQyf4oDJFQE], or simply "Insider" on BBCA's own site [http://videos.bbcamerica.com/video/27982471001/Doctor-Who/836176502001/Season-6/930877509001/Doctor-Who-Insider-Ep-2--Karen-Gillan-on-Guns-Body-Bags/]. Perhaps either of those titles would be enough to keep the two articles distinct, with the standard "you may be looking for" line atop each article pointing to the other? [[User:Rob T Firefly|Rob T Firefly]] 22:12, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:15, 7 June 2011

IndexPanopticon → Disambiguating the two Doctor Who Insiders
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.

Before we get too far into the run of the magazine Doctor Who Insider, we need to decide how we're going to handle the mini-documentary series on BBCA, also called Doctor Who Insider. I personally think that disambiguation policy would say that they both should be disambiguated — hence Doctor Who Insider (magazine) and Doctor Who Insider (documentary). Anyone got any particularly strong feelings in another direction?
czechout<staff />    <span style="">00:49:31 Tue 07 Jun 2011 

The documentary series is titled "Doctor Who: Insider" (with the colon) on BBCA's official YouTube.[1], or simply "Insider" on BBCA's own site [2]. Perhaps either of those titles would be enough to keep the two articles distinct, with the standard "you may be looking for" line atop each article pointing to the other? Rob T Firefly 22:12, June 7, 2011 (UTC)