49,076
edits
More actions
Forum:Is in-character linking narration canonical? (edit)
Revision as of 22:44, 22 August 2011
, 22 August 2011no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
::::Well, I think it's a special case so it kinda deserves special rules. I only have two examples that spring readily to mind. One is this ''Crusade'' thing. The other is the [[Fourth Doctor]] version of ''[[Power of the Daleks]]''. I think I'd be okay with references to them both being the company that produced the thing they were on. So for instance [[BBC Video]]: ''[[The Crusade]]''. The problem here is, of course, that these little segments have no name. The only distinguishing characteristic is really the medium/company of release. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''22:43:14 Mon '''22 Aug 2011 </span> | ::::Well, I think it's a special case so it kinda deserves special rules. I only have two examples that spring readily to mind. One is this ''Crusade'' thing. The other is the [[Fourth Doctor]] version of ''[[Power of the Daleks]]''. I think I'd be okay with references to them both being the company that produced the thing they were on. So for instance [[BBC Video]]: ''[[The Crusade]]''. The problem here is, of course, that these little segments have no name. The only distinguishing characteristic is really the medium/company of release. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''22:43:14 Mon '''22 Aug 2011 </span> | ||
If BBC Wales says it's valid, then it's canon. That's a lot clearer than vague references to CURSE OF THE FATAL DEATH as a dream. [[User:Boblipton|Boblipton]] 22:44, August 22, 2011 (UTC) | |||