Forum:Can we change how stories are cited?: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
(+reply)
Line 10: Line 10:


It's an out-of-universe style now I am trying to make it an in-universe syle but all my ideas have been shot down!! So give me a good suggestion or let me do what I have to do. Thank You[[User:The 10th Doctor|The 10th Doctor]] 23:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
It's an out-of-universe style now I am trying to make it an in-universe syle but all my ideas have been shot down!! So give me a good suggestion or let me do what I have to do. Thank You[[User:The 10th Doctor|The 10th Doctor]] 23:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
:It's not an out-of-universe style now. It's slightly out-of-universe, but less than your current idea would be (presuming that we've interpreted it correctly). And what do you mean by "do what [you] have to do"? {{:User:Ghelæ/sig}} 15:42, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:42, 3 January 2008

IndexPanopticon → Can we change how stories are cited?
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.

Instead of my previous idea how about this to clean up the article. We can put the topic on top of the episode information. Kind of like when you leave a message. Do you get what I'm saying?--The 10th Doctor 01:57, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Can someone please answer my question!!!The 10th Doctor 01:59, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

No, I don't get what you're saying. What do you mean? -<Azes13 15:44, 30 December 2007 (UTC)>-
I think he might mean having the title of the episode as a header above the information given in that episode. In which case, we won't be doing that as it would make the articles even more disorderly and, even worse, out-of-universe. ~ Ghelæ -talk-contribs 08:07, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

It's an out-of-universe style now I am trying to make it an in-universe syle but all my ideas have been shot down!! So give me a good suggestion or let me do what I have to do. Thank YouThe 10th Doctor 23:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

It's not an out-of-universe style now. It's slightly out-of-universe, but less than your current idea would be (presuming that we've interpreted it correctly). And what do you mean by "do what [you] have to do"? ~ Ghelæ -talk-contribs 15:42, 3 January 2008 (UTC)