Forum:DWBIT: Odd man out: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-DWA Issue 1 +DWA 1)) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
When naming issues of magazines, we seem to be fairly consistent. We take a proper acronym of the magazine's title, right? | When naming issues of magazines, we seem to be fairly consistent. We take a proper acronym of the magazine's title, right? | ||
*[[DWM Issue 1]] | *[[DWM Issue 1]] | ||
*[[DWA | *[[DWA 1]] | ||
But then we get to ''[[Doctor Who: Battles in Time]]'' and suddenly it's | But then we get to ''[[Doctor Who: Battles in Time]]'' and suddenly it's | ||
Revision as of 01:34, 5 October 2011
Template:Forum archives header When naming issues of magazines, we seem to be fairly consistent. We take a proper acronym of the magazine's title, right?
But then we get to Doctor Who: Battles in Time and suddenly it's
Can anyone give a good reason why I shouldn't mass move all issues of DWBIT to the format, DWBIT Issue 1?
- Nup.
- I can't think of any bad reasons either. --Tangerineduel / talk 15:44, February 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Implemented, in concert with ideas mooted at Forum:DWM Issue 000/DWM. See Tardis:Manual of Style#Magazine issues for resulting policy.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">01:55:31 Tue 05 Apr 2011
- Implemented, in concert with ideas mooted at Forum:DWM Issue 000/DWM. See Tardis:Manual of Style#Magazine issues for resulting policy.
