Retroactive continuity: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{Real_world}} '''Retroactive Continuity''', also known as '''retcon''', is the phenomenom of dealing with continuity errors in fiction after the fact. Retcon can consist of som...") |
(ground-up rewrite) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Real_world}} | {{Real_world}} | ||
'''Retroactive | '''Retroactive continuity''' is a narrative point established in a new story which "fixes" continuity problems in older stories, or simply re-interprets past narrative elements in a new light. The shortened form of the phrase is '''''retcon''''', which can be a noun or a verb. The act of providing narrative fixes for past sins is called '''''retconning''''' a noun form of the verb, '''''to retcon'''''. Likewise, individual instances of retconning are called '''''retcons'''''. | ||
==Overview== | |||
The ''Doctor Who'' universe, having been created by hundreds of | Retcons happen in all major fictional narratives, especially those that have existed for a long time. Longer-lived franchises are particularly prone to retconning, as they tend to be created by a number of different artists, not all of whom may have an enyclopaedic knowledge of the franchise's history. Thus, conflicting accounts will necessarily arise, and refactoring of information may be necessary. | ||
==Within the ''Doctor Who'' universe== | |||
The [[Doctor Who universe|''Doctor Who'' universe]], having been created in a particularly chaotic way by hundreds if not thousands of different creative talents in all media, is littered with continuity mistakes — and retcons to explain them away. Indeed, the very nature of the franchise as a narrative about a time traveller in a universe where "time can be rewritten" practically ''invites'' contradictory accounts. The existence of a drug named [[retcon]] as an in-universe concept within ''[[Torchwood (TV series)|Torchwood]]'' narratives, is certainly a nod to the ubiquity of the concept within the [[Doctor Who universe|DWU]]. | |||
==Examples== | |||
Examples of DWU retcons are numerous and varied. However, some of the more obvious indlude: | |||
*The last-minute ''[[The Caves of Androzani|Caves of Androzani]]'' explanation for why the [[Fifth Doctor]] had been wearing [[celery]] on his lapel since ''[[Castrovalva (TV story)|Castrovalva]]'' | |||
*The fact that [[the TARDIS]]' console room design changes over the year were the result of the Doctor changing "the desktop theme" — thus absolving the [[set designer]]s and [[set decorator|decorators]] of narrative responsibility for their occasional inconsistencies over the years. | |||
*[[Idris]]' explanation that the TARDIS doors were meant to swing out, but the Doctor chose to swing them inward, thus allowing for those occasions like ''[[The Eleventh Hour]]'' and ''[[The Ice Warriors]]'', where the doors did indeed swing out. | |||
*The [[Tenth Doctor]]'s revelation in ''[[The Stolen Earth]]'' that the TARDIS console was six-sided because it was ''meant'' to be piloted by six people, thus explaining why all incarnations of the Doctor couldn't always fly the TARDIS reliably. | |||
[[Category:DW TV discontinuity]] | [[Category:DW TV discontinuity]] | ||
Revision as of 02:22, 18 October 2011
Retroactive continuity is a narrative point established in a new story which "fixes" continuity problems in older stories, or simply re-interprets past narrative elements in a new light. The shortened form of the phrase is retcon, which can be a noun or a verb. The act of providing narrative fixes for past sins is called retconning a noun form of the verb, to retcon. Likewise, individual instances of retconning are called retcons.
Overview
Retcons happen in all major fictional narratives, especially those that have existed for a long time. Longer-lived franchises are particularly prone to retconning, as they tend to be created by a number of different artists, not all of whom may have an enyclopaedic knowledge of the franchise's history. Thus, conflicting accounts will necessarily arise, and refactoring of information may be necessary.
Within the Doctor Who universe
The Doctor Who universe, having been created in a particularly chaotic way by hundreds if not thousands of different creative talents in all media, is littered with continuity mistakes — and retcons to explain them away. Indeed, the very nature of the franchise as a narrative about a time traveller in a universe where "time can be rewritten" practically invites contradictory accounts. The existence of a drug named retcon as an in-universe concept within Torchwood narratives, is certainly a nod to the ubiquity of the concept within the DWU.
Examples
Examples of DWU retcons are numerous and varied. However, some of the more obvious indlude:
- The last-minute Caves of Androzani explanation for why the Fifth Doctor had been wearing celery on his lapel since Castrovalva
- The fact that the TARDIS' console room design changes over the year were the result of the Doctor changing "the desktop theme" — thus absolving the set designers and decorators of narrative responsibility for their occasional inconsistencies over the years.
- Idris' explanation that the TARDIS doors were meant to swing out, but the Doctor chose to swing them inward, thus allowing for those occasions like The Eleventh Hour and The Ice Warriors, where the doors did indeed swing out.
- The Tenth Doctor's revelation in The Stolen Earth that the TARDIS console was six-sided because it was meant to be piloted by six people, thus explaining why all incarnations of the Doctor couldn't always fly the TARDIS reliably.
