Category talk:Near-human species: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(+reply) |
m (upholding T:HUMAN) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
How close does "physically identical" have to be? Does it have to be "indistinguable from" Humans (in which case the orange-skinned [[Lurman]]s shouldn't be classed as a Near-Humans), or should it mean close to Humans - humanoid, with the main features (hair, nose, eyes) almost identical to Humans (in which the [[Lurman]]s could stay in, and the silver-skinned [[Diplosian]]s could go in the categor)? {{:User:Ghelæ/sig}} 16:42, 18 November 2006 (UTC) | How close does "physically identical" have to be? Does it have to be "indistinguable from" Humans (in which case the orange-skinned [[Lurman]]s shouldn't be classed as a Near-Humans), or should it mean close to Humans - humanoid, with the main features (hair, nose, eyes) almost identical to Humans (in which the [[Lurman]]s could stay in, and the silver-skinned [[Diplosian]]s could go in the categor)? {{:User:Ghelæ/sig}} 16:42, 18 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
:I meant that they could pass as [[ | :I meant that they could pass as [[human]]s without close scrutiny . I've seen Humans with a more extreme skin-tone then the [[Lurman]]s, though I've never seen one with silver skin. [[User:Azes13|Azes13]] 22:23, 18 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
::Ah, ok. {{:User:Ghelæ/sig}} 08:13, 19 November 2006 (UTC) | ::Ah, ok. {{:User:Ghelæ/sig}} 08:13, 19 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:25, 20 October 2011
How close does "physically identical" have to be? Does it have to be "indistinguable from" Humans (in which case the orange-skinned Lurmans shouldn't be classed as a Near-Humans), or should it mean close to Humans - humanoid, with the main features (hair, nose, eyes) almost identical to Humans (in which the Lurmans could stay in, and the silver-skinned Diplosians could go in the categor)? ~ Ghelæ -talk-contribs 16:42, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
