User:Original Authority: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


{| style="float:left;border:3px solid #043a9d; background-color:#ffffff;"
{| style="float:left;border:3px solid #043a9d; background-color:#ffffff;"
| style="background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 150%; color:#ffffff;border: Stripy; text-align:center; width: 100px" | <div style="background:#FFFFFF;">[[file:Billy and Delta.jpg|100px|link=Delta and the Bannermen]][[file:I am alive.jpg|100px|link=Meglos (TV story)]][[file:Making a beachhead.jpg|100px|link=The Keys of Marinus]][[file:Romana uses Telescope.jpg|100px|link=State of Decay]][[file:The Armageddon Factor.jpg|100px|link=The Armageddon Factor]]</div>
| style="background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 150%; color:#ffffff;border:Black; text-align:center; width: 100px" |  
|}
|}



Revision as of 14:33, 28 October 2011


TARDIS contributions | TARDIS edit count |
TARDIS Sandbox | My Sandboxes


Dining in.jpg

This is absolutely vintage stuffThe Third Doctor [Carnival of Monsters [src]]

See my talk page to ask anything.
See also:
Sandbox one  • Sandbox two


What I do All Day

Hi!,So I'm not here Allot I'M normally at the Vampire Diaries Wiki but I am trying to get in the mode of Editing Here But now you know everything about me



  1. No, I don't know why this number is different than the tally number in the blue-and-white box above it. But that hardly matters. The point is that this figure has what can only be called a dubious provenance. While considered accurate by some Draconians and Racnoss, Raxacoricofallapatorians, Usurians and Mentors have predictably allied themselves in opposition to the number as representing an unacceptable level of anti-profitability. The CIA have also found it problematically low, and it may be one of the reasons they assigned Lady Serena to be the Second Doctor's parole officer in PDA: World Game. Nevertheless, recent computations by Mr Smith and Ricky Smith and Lavinia Smith agree that the number is accurate, much to the chagrin of John Smith.