Forum:Near-human: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-{{Forumheader|Reference desk}} +{{Archive|Reference desk archives}}))
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Forumheader|Reference desk}}
{{Archive|Reference desk archives}}
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ -->
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ -->
If anyone ever runs across the term [[near-human]] in any bit of fiction anywhere in the DWU, please put a reference here for me.  If in a book, it'd be helpful if you could give the page number.  The near-human article really needs a source for the actual term.  Thanks :) {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''01:41:40 Tue&nbsp;'''14 Jun 2011&nbsp;</span>
If anyone ever runs across the term [[near-human]] in any bit of fiction anywhere in the DWU, please put a reference here for me.  If in a book, it'd be helpful if you could give the page number.  The near-human article really needs a source for the actual term.  Thanks :) {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''01:41:40 Tue&nbsp;'''14 Jun 2011&nbsp;</span>


:There's shouldn't be any reference to it; I just needed a convenient term when making the category, so I took it from ''[[Star Wars]]''. We really need to either rename the category or remove it entirely. I haven't seen a specific canonical term for those pseudo-human species, but there have been canonical references to the fact that the species look visually identical, so it's probably worth keeping in some form. -<[[User:Azes13|Azes13]] 02:26, June 14, 2011 (UTC)>-
:There's shouldn't be any reference to it; I just needed a convenient term when making the category, so I took it from ''[[Star Wars]]''. We really need to either rename the category or remove it entirely. I haven't seen a specific canonical term for those pseudo-human species, but there have been canonical references to the fact that the species look visually identical, so it's probably worth keeping in some form. -<[[User:Azes13|Azes13]] 02:26, June 14, 2011 (UTC)>-

Revision as of 18:56, 7 November 2011

ForumsArchive indexReference desk archives → Near-human
This thread has been archived.
Please create a new thread on the new forums if you want to talk about this topic some more.
Please DO NOT add to this discussion.


If anyone ever runs across the term near-human in any bit of fiction anywhere in the DWU, please put a reference here for me. If in a book, it'd be helpful if you could give the page number. The near-human article really needs a source for the actual term. Thanks :)
czechout<staff />    <span style="">01:41:40 Tue 14 Jun 2011 

There's shouldn't be any reference to it; I just needed a convenient term when making the category, so I took it from Star Wars. We really need to either rename the category or remove it entirely. I haven't seen a specific canonical term for those pseudo-human species, but there have been canonical references to the fact that the species look visually identical, so it's probably worth keeping in some form. -<Azes13 02:26, June 14, 2011 (UTC)>-