765,429
edits
More actions
Forum:Is in-character linking narration canonical? (edit)
Revision as of 04:39, 14 December 2011
, 14 December 2011Robot: Automated text replacement (-Power of the Daleks +The Power of the Daleks)
No edit summary |
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-Power of the Daleks +The Power of the Daleks)) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:::But I am concerned about what other stuff is lurking out there that might also fall into this category. Or might fall just outside of this category but may be included within it because it's ''close''. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 13:54, August 22, 2011 (UTC) | :::But I am concerned about what other stuff is lurking out there that might also fall into this category. Or might fall just outside of this category but may be included within it because it's ''close''. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 13:54, August 22, 2011 (UTC) | ||
::::Well, I think it's a special case so it kinda deserves special rules. I only have two examples that spring readily to mind. One is this ''Crusade'' thing. The other is the [[Fourth Doctor]] version of ''[[Power of the Daleks]]''. I think I'd be okay with references to them both being the company that produced the thing they were on. So for instance [[BBC Video]]: ''[[The Crusade]]''. The problem here is, of course, that these little segments have no name. The only distinguishing characteristic is really the medium/company of release. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''22:43:14 Mon '''22 Aug 2011 </span> | ::::Well, I think it's a special case so it kinda deserves special rules. I only have two examples that spring readily to mind. One is this ''Crusade'' thing. The other is the [[Fourth Doctor]] version of ''[[The Power of the Daleks]]''. I think I'd be okay with references to them both being the company that produced the thing they were on. So for instance [[BBC Video]]: ''[[The Crusade]]''. The problem here is, of course, that these little segments have no name. The only distinguishing characteristic is really the medium/company of release. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''22:43:14 Mon '''22 Aug 2011 </span> | ||
If BBC Wales says it's valid, then it's canon. That's a lot clearer than vague references to CURSE OF THE FATAL DEATH as a dream. [[User:Boblipton|Boblipton]] 22:44, August 22, 2011 (UTC) | If BBC Wales says it's valid, then it's canon. That's a lot clearer than vague references to CURSE OF THE FATAL DEATH as a dream. [[User:Boblipton|Boblipton]] 22:44, August 22, 2011 (UTC) | ||