Forum:Ravalox or Ravolox?: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
-- [[User:Gousha|Gousha]] <sup>[[User talk:Gousha|talk to me]]</sup> 02:32, December 14, 2011 (UTC) | -- [[User:Gousha|Gousha]] <sup>[[User talk:Gousha|talk to me]]</sup> 02:32, December 14, 2011 (UTC) | ||
:The article name is Ravolox. That's the correct spelling. [[User:Boblipton|Boblipton]] <sup>[[User talk:Boblipton|talk to me]]</sup> 12:53, December 14, 2011 (UTC) | |||
By what source? -- [[User:Gousha|Gousha]] <sup>[[User talk:Gousha|talk to me]]</sup> 18:12, December 14, 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:12, 14 December 2011
Index → Panopticon → Ravalox or Ravolox?
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
I see a large number of cases where the planet Ravolox is alternately spelled Ravalox... even in the article itself. Do we have any significant proof of one over the other? Perhaps in the promo material, or the script, plus the novelisation.
If (as I suspect) both spellings have been used in official material, then a proper comment needs to be made in the article. But I'd like to confirm that first. -- Gousha talk to me 02:32, December 14, 2011 (UTC)
- The article name is Ravolox. That's the correct spelling. Boblipton talk to me 12:53, December 14, 2011 (UTC)
By what source? -- Gousha talk to me 18:12, December 14, 2011 (UTC)
