Talk:Dalek history: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
(→Order) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
::The problem with a list is, well it wouldn't make sense, there needs to be small summaries because there's so much contradictory information. Also a lot of Dalek history can be dated (or put into perspective based on what is said), and doesn't actually follow a logical spaceflight era, time travel era sort of progression. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 07:49, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | ::The problem with a list is, well it wouldn't make sense, there needs to be small summaries because there's so much contradictory information. Also a lot of Dalek history can be dated (or put into perspective based on what is said), and doesn't actually follow a logical spaceflight era, time travel era sort of progression. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 07:49, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::Well, I do want to avoid in-page speculation as much as the next guy; that way lies madness. However, the fact remains that unless The Doctor was wrong about the date for some reason (which ''does'' stray into the realm of speculation), we have an explicit statement that the events of [[The Daleks]] took place a million years after [[The Dalek Invasion of Earth]], but here, it's listed as their "Early History". That can't be right. [[User:Caswin|Caswin]] 02:25, 17 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:25, 17 May 2008
Help!
This page needs work anyone out there with a bit of spare time please?
Order
Shouldn't the example from "The Daleks" be much later in the timeline? In "The Dalek Invasion of Earth", The Doctor explains that their first conflict with the Daleks took place a million of years after the invasion of Earth, it sounds like it should be well after most if not all of the events on this list. Have I missed something? Or is this just in the order the stories were released? Caswin 22:59, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- I believe that the Wiki should stay as neutral as possible about the order of events, since we don't know them. I would not attempt to summarize the history. I would just list events in the order of: Creation; Spaceflight era; time travel era (which might well overlap the previous era) and the Last Great Time War era. if you start giving an order of events beyond that, you stray into fanon and speculation. 24.61.13.0 01:28, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- On account of The Daleks, there needs to be a degree of logic applied because of the stories that came after it, in order to place it anywhere the start makes the most sense. If it goes anywhere else it has to be that they were a break away group. Which is fine and dandy, except the story also needs to have taken place before Planet of the Daleks which is the first mention of the whole legend, Ian Barbara and the Doctor (Rebec I think mentions it). It also needs to take place before Destiny of the Daleks as the Daleks go ransacking Skaro, and Skaro is a planet lacking people at that point. Additionally in I, Davros: Guilt there is a scene which seems to feature a Dalek seen in The Daleks. --Tangerineduel 07:49, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- The problem with a list is, well it wouldn't make sense, there needs to be small summaries because there's so much contradictory information. Also a lot of Dalek history can be dated (or put into perspective based on what is said), and doesn't actually follow a logical spaceflight era, time travel era sort of progression. --Tangerineduel 07:49, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I do want to avoid in-page speculation as much as the next guy; that way lies madness. However, the fact remains that unless The Doctor was wrong about the date for some reason (which does stray into the realm of speculation), we have an explicit statement that the events of The Daleks took place a million years after The Dalek Invasion of Earth, but here, it's listed as their "Early History". That can't be right. Caswin 02:25, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
