Talk:Attack of the Graske (video game): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Come to think of it...) |
(Thoughts on categorising the story.) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::Hmm, the more I think about it, the more it seems to qualify as a pastiche rather than a canonical television story. I'll be making the appropriate changes. | ::Hmm, the more I think about it, the more it seems to qualify as a pastiche rather than a canonical television story. I'll be making the appropriate changes. | ||
--[[User:Freethinker1of1|Freethinker1of1]] 15:59, 22 March 2006 (UTC) | --[[User:Freethinker1of1|Freethinker1of1]] 15:59, 22 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
:::I'm not sure that I agree that it's a pastiche (though I know what you're getting at). I would suggest, due to its interactive nature, that it would be more appropriately categorised as a game (just like the various other Who computer games).<BR>--[[User:Mantrid|Mantrid]] 17:41, 22 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:41, 22 March 2006
I'm being deliberately provocative and controvertial here, but is this story 'canon'? Discuss!
--Mantrid 19:20, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- I dunno, but it certainly shouldn't be listed under "Television stories". Ben Standeven 22:03, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
- Hmm, the more I think about it, the more it seems to qualify as a pastiche rather than a canonical television story. I'll be making the appropriate changes.
--Freethinker1of1 15:59, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that I agree that it's a pastiche (though I know what you're getting at). I would suggest, due to its interactive nature, that it would be more appropriately categorised as a game (just like the various other Who computer games).
--Mantrid 17:41, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that I agree that it's a pastiche (though I know what you're getting at). I would suggest, due to its interactive nature, that it would be more appropriately categorised as a game (just like the various other Who computer games).
