229,659
edits
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
You're confusing "putting words in [your] mouth" with 'taking your reasoning to its logical conclusion'. As for the idea that because the [[BBC New Series Adventures]] has included audio books and anthologies they would consider releasing a novelization ('''which they have never done before period''') let alone of an unreleased story, that's a truly herculean leap of logic. If that's what you're suggesting Harness made, again, you're suggesting Harness is incompetent. | You're confusing "putting words in [your] mouth" with 'taking your reasoning to its logical conclusion'. As for the idea that because the [[BBC New Series Adventures]] has included audio books and anthologies they would consider releasing a novelization ('''which they have never done before period''') let alone of an unreleased story, that's a truly herculean leap of logic. If that's what you're suggesting Harness made, again, you're suggesting Harness is incompetent. | ||
Line 13: | Line 12: | ||
Since none of these four options, and again, I'm being immensely charitable to even consider four, is likely, we turn to the other alternative. It was a framing device. Reductio ad absurdum is evidence. It not being a framing device leads to absurdity. | Since none of these four options, and again, I'm being immensely charitable to even consider four, is likely, we turn to the other alternative. It was a framing device. Reductio ad absurdum is evidence. It not being a framing device leads to absurdity. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200606025128-45314928/20200607061338-45692830]]</noinclude> |