229,659
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1317169-20121202170842/@comment-188432-20130111221905 (edit)
Revision as of 20:46, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't want to derail the conversation, especially since we seem to be able to find some common ground here. But I do feel compelled to note that we '''are''' editors. It is our job to note what information is appropriate for an article. Definitionally, we do cut information, all the time. | I don't want to derail the conversation, especially since we seem to be able to find some common ground here. But I do feel compelled to note that we '''are''' editors. It is our job to note what information is appropriate for an article. Definitionally, we do cut information, all the time. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
So that's why I say I support the inclusion of "hairdryer" at ''[[Dalek (TV story)|Dalek]]'' only in an inline list. And if that inline list isn't available, then it ''certainly'' doesn't deserve the space afforded by a bulleted list. | So that's why I say I support the inclusion of "hairdryer" at ''[[Dalek (TV story)|Dalek]]'' only in an inline list. And if that inline list isn't available, then it ''certainly'' doesn't deserve the space afforded by a bulleted list. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20121202170842-1317169/20130111221905-188432]]</noinclude> | ||