229,566
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130914215712/@comment-188432-20130920154806: Difference between revisions
More actions
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130914215712/@comment-188432-20130920154806 (edit)
Revision as of 22:11, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Well, it seems to me that we're all agreed that the current system isn't working. It's illogical that BBC should lead to in-universe and British Broadcasting Corporation to the real world. | Well, it seems to me that we're all agreed that the current system isn't working. It's illogical that BBC should lead to in-universe and British Broadcasting Corporation to the real world. | ||
| Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
To my mind there is no logic to saying that we ''can'' write articles that start in-universe and then have a RW section, but that we ''can't'' write articles that start RW but then have an in-universe section. | To my mind there is no logic to saying that we ''can'' write articles that start in-universe and then have a RW section, but that we ''can't'' write articles that start RW but then have an in-universe section. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130914215712-188432/20130920154806-188432]]</noinclude> | ||