229,659
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20121212231649/@comment-188432-20121227011149: Difference between revisions
More actions
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20121212231649/@comment-188432-20121227011149 (edit)
Revision as of 23:14, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Almost everything declared invalid has a link back to a specific discussion in which they were declared invalid. The '''functional ''definition''''' of "invalid source" is that it's one which doesn't get covered here, and which may not, therefore, be used as a source for in-universe articles. | Almost everything declared invalid has a link back to a specific discussion in which they were declared invalid. The '''functional ''definition''''' of "invalid source" is that it's one which doesn't get covered here, and which may not, therefore, be used as a source for in-universe articles. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 8: | ||
So let me ask you: what would be clearer? Should we add a little template at the end of these articles that more thoroughly explains our position, kind of like what's been done at [[Worlds in Time]]? Would that alleviate your concerns? | So let me ask you: what would be clearer? Should we add a little template at the end of these articles that more thoroughly explains our position, kind of like what's been done at [[Worlds in Time]]? Would that alleviate your concerns? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20121212231649-4028641/20121227011149-188432]]</noinclude> | ||