229,659
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-45692830-20200511054726/@comment-31010985-20200511071637: Difference between revisions
More actions
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-45692830-20200511054726/@comment-31010985-20200511071637 (edit)
Revision as of 23:45, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't see any reason why we can't create the pages. In fact, the mention of DWM isn't a problem because we already have [[Doctor Who Magazine (The Thief of Sherwood)]] as a place to put this new info. Again, this is nothing new. Why diverge from our most basic policy for page creation of covering all nouns now? | I don't see any reason why we can't create the pages. In fact, the mention of DWM isn't a problem because we already have [[Doctor Who Magazine (The Thief of Sherwood)]] as a place to put this new info. Again, this is nothing new. Why diverge from our most basic policy for page creation of covering all nouns now? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20200511054726-45692830/20200511071637-31010985]]</noinclude> | ||