Fanon: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
 
(35 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Cleanup|This page treats still somewhat treats canon as a valid concept regarding ''Doctor Who'', despite there not being a canon. Just needs a general cleanup in that regard.<br>As a suggested addition to this page, it could mention how it is commonly believed that the Doctor has been portrayed as a Time Lord since ''AUC'' despite that not being correct.}}
{{real world}}
{{real world}}
'''Fanon''' is a body of popular suppositions and theories accepted by fans concerning the [[Doctor Who universe|''Doctor Who'' universe]]. It is a [[wikipedia:portmanteau|portmanteau]] of the words "fan" and "[[canon]]".  
'''Fanon''' is a body of popular suppositions and theories accepted by fans concerning the [[Doctor Who universe|''Doctor Who'' universe]]. It is a {{w|portmanteau}} of the words "fan" and "[[canon]]".


Fanon often gets confused for "canon", even if it is not supported by evidence either on screen or in print.
Fanon often gets confused for "canon", even if it is not supported by evidence either on screen or in print.


== Derivations ==
== Derivations ==
When stories break fanon conventions, it can cause controversy. A longstanding piece of fanon is the supposition that the Doctor, due to his alien nature, is incapable of romance or [[Sexuality|sexual attraction]]. Despite the existence of a [[Susan Foreman|granddaughter]], and occasional minor references during the early years of the show, much of this supposition stems from the [[Fourth Doctor]]'s odd reference to [[Countess Scarlioni]] in ''[[City of Death (TV story)|City of Death]]'' as "a beautiful woman, probably," as well as the 1963-89 series' general aversion to including romantic entanglements due to its long-standing image as a children's program. The [[Doctor Who (TV story)|''Doctor Who'' 1996 telefilm]] was controversial with some fans in that it showed the [[Eighth Doctor]] kissing [[Grace Holloway]] twice, the latter in an unambiguously romantic way, which was accused of violating canon, even though it only violated ''fanon''. The revived series has since thoroughly rendered this piece of fanon moot by featuring later Doctors in numerous romantic situations and entanglements; several novels published since 1991 have also featured romantic situations for the Doctor previously considered taboo; examples include ''[[Human Nature (novel)|Human Nature]]'' and the conclusion of ''[[The Dying Days (novel)|The Dying Days]]''.


Some fanon derives from from non-[[canon]] sources such as ''[[The Doctor Who Role Playing Game]]'', which, for example, made [[the Master]], [[the Monk]] and [[the War Chief]] into the same [[Time Lord]].
An example of fanon stemming from the series revival is the question of "[[TARDIS coral]]". Fans have come to use this term to refer to pieces of TARDIS obtained by [[Jack Harkness]] (''[[Torchwood (TV series)|Torchwood]]'') and the [[Meta-Crisis Tenth Doctor]] ([[TV]]: ''[[Journey's End (TV story)|Journey's End]]'' - deleted scene). In fact, as of July 2009 no episode has ever used the term to describe these objects, nor have any close-ups indicated whether they are, indeed, coral-like. The issue is further muddied by the fact the ''Journey's End'' reference was deleted from the final episode, raising the question of its canonicity.
 
When stories break fanon conventions, it can cause controversy. A longstanding piece of fanon is the supposition that the Doctor, due to his alien nature, is incapable of romance or sexual attraction. Despite the existence of a [[Susan Foreman|granddaughter]], and occasional minor references during the early years of the show, much of this supposition stems from the [[Fourth Doctor]]'s odd reference to [[Countess Scarlioni]] in [[TV]]: ''[[City of Death]]'' as "a beautiful woman, probably," as well as the 1963-89 series' general aversion to including romantic entanglements due to its long-standing image as a children's program. The [[Doctor Who (1996)|Doctor Who telefilm]] of 1996 was controversial with some fans because it showed the [[Eighth Doctor]] kissing [[Grace Holloway]] twice, the latter in an unambiguously romantic way, which was accused of violating canon, even though it only violated ''fanon''. (The revived series has since thoroughly rendered this piece of fanon moot by featuring later Doctors in numerous romantic situations and entanglements; several novels published since 1991 have also featured romantic situations for the Doctor previously considered taboo; examples include ''[[Human Nature (novel)|Human Nature]]'' and the conclusion of ''[[The Dying Days]]''.)
 
An example of fanon stemming from the series revival is the question of "[[TARDIS coral]]". Fans have come to use this term to refer to pieces of TARDIS obtained by [[Jack Harkness]] (''[[Torchwood (TV series)|Torchwood]]'') and the [[Meta-Crisis Tenth Doctor]] ([[TV]]: ''[[Journey's End]]'' - deleted scene). In fact, as of July 2009 no episode has ever used the term to describe these objects, nor have any close-ups indicated whether they are, indeed, coral-like. The issue is further muddied by the fact the ''Journey's End'' reference was deleted from the final episode, raising the question of its canonicity.  


== When fanon becomes canon ==
== When fanon becomes canon ==
Fanon and canon are not necessarily exclusive of each other. It has been occasionally known for elements originating in fanon to be adopted into canon.
Fanon and canon are not necessarily exclusive of each other. It has been occasionally known for elements originating in fanon to be adopted into canon.


=== In Spin-offs ===
=== In spin-offs ===
The BBC has never made a firm proclamation regarding whether novels and other spin-off works should be considered canonical in relation to theier television series. Still, spin-off media have been known to add elements of fanon into their own canon.
The BBC has never made a firm proclamation regarding whether novels and other spin-off works should be considered canonical in relation to their television series. Still, spin-off media have been known to add elements of fanon into their own canon.


Some fan theories, such as the [[Season 6B]] theory, while not as yet confirmed on-screen, have been supported by expanded universe spin-offs such as novels (which are of uncertain canonicity). Others, such as the question raised by [[TV]]: ''[[Planet of Fire]]'' as to whether the Doctor and the Master are actually brothers, have been denied by off-screen sources, if not necessarily on-screen.
Some fan theories, such as the [[Season 6B]] theory, while not as yet ''explicitly'' confirmed on-screen, have been supported by expanded universe spin-offs such as novels. Others, such as the question raised by ''[[Planet of Fire (TV story)|Planet of Fire]]'' as to whether the Doctor and the Master are actually brothers, have been denied by off-screen sources, if not necessarily on-screen.


The aforementioned Season 6B theory comes close to being "canon", having been featured in a [[BBC Past Doctor Adventures]] novel and endorsed by former script editor [[Terrance Dicks]] (who wrote the book in question, ''[[World Game]]''). This theory started with a series of 1969 ''TV Comic'' stories featuring a companion-less [[Second Doctor]] exiled on Earth (and, after a few adventures, being forced to regenerate inside his TARDIS), and continued with his involvement in both [[TV]]: ''[[The Five Doctors (TV story)|The Five Doctors]]'' and [[TV]]: ''[[The Two Doctors]]''.
The aforementioned Season 6B theory comes close to being "canon", having been featured in a [[BBC Past Doctor Adventures]] novel and endorsed by former script editor [[Terrance Dicks]] (who wrote the book in question, ''[[World Game (novel)|World Game]]''). This theory started with a series of 1969 ''TV Comic'' stories featuring a companion-less [[Second Doctor]] exiled on Earth (and, after a few adventures, being forced to regenerate inside his TARDIS), and continued with his involvement in both ''[[The Five Doctors (TV story)|The Five Doctors]]'' and ''[[The Two Doctors]]''.


=== In Televised ''Doctor Who'' ===
=== In televised ''Doctor Who'' ===
Occasionally, a piece of fanon will find its way not just into the spinoffs, but into ''Doctor Who'' proper.
Occasionally, a piece of fanon will find its way not just into the spinoffs, but into ''Doctor Who'' proper.


* The concept that [[the Doctor's TARDIS]] is meant to be operated by six pilots at once was a long-standing piece of fanon which was finally confirmed in ''[[Journey's End]].''
* The concept that [[the Doctor's TARDIS]] is meant to be operated by six pilots at once was a long-standing piece of fanon which was finally confirmed in ''[[Journey's End (TV story)|Journey's End]]''.
 
* The idea of the Doctor's TARDIS being a sentient, living creature in its own right rather than a mere functional vehicle was occasionally distantly implied in the classic ''Doctor Who'' television series, but greatly expanded upon in fanon and spin-off media. Eventually the concept found its way into televised ''Doctor Who,'' with the soul of the TARDIS making itself fully known to the [[Eleventh Doctor]] in ''[[The Doctor's Wife (TV story)|The Doctor's Wife]]''.{{disputed}}
* The idea of the Doctor's TARDIS being a sentient, living creature in its own right rather than a mere functional vehicle was occasionally distantly implied in the classic ''Doctor Who'' television series, but greatly expanded upon in fanon and spin-off media. Eventually the concept found its way into televised ''Doctor Who,'' with the [[Ninth Doctor]] declaring the TARDIS to be "alive" in ''[[Boom Town]],'' and the soul of the TARDIS making itself fully known to the [[Eleventh Doctor]] in ''[[The Doctor's Wife]].''
* The possibility that a [[Time Lord]] might possibly change gender when they [[regeneration|regenerate]] was notably hinted at by [[John Nathan-Turner]] and [[Tom Baker]], when as a publicity stunt they suggested to the press that Baker's replacement in the role of [[the Doctor]] might be female, but the idea was never used on-screen. The idea entered fanon and occasionally appeared in spin-off media such as ''[[Interference - Book One (novel)|Interference - Book One]]'' and ''[[The Curse of Fatal Death (TV story)|The Curse of Fatal Death]]'', before eventually being mentioned on-screen in ''[[The Doctor's Wife (TV story)|The Doctor's Wife]]'' and revealed to have actually occurred on screen in ''[[Deep Breath (TV story)|Deep Breath]]'' by way of [[Missy]] revealing herself as [[the Master]] in ''[[Dark Water (TV story)|Dark Water]]''.
 
* The fanon notion that, due to the complexities of constant time travel, the Doctor doesn't actually know [[The Doctor's age|how old he is]] had been hinted at in the comic ''[[Doctor Who and the Time Witch (comic story)|Doctor Who and the Time Witch]]'' and the novel ''[[Vampire Science (novel)|Vampire Science]]''. The idea entered televised canon when the [[Eleventh Doctor]] admitted to being unsure of his own age in ''[[The Day of the Doctor (TV story)|The Day of the Doctor]]''.
* The possibility that a [[Time Lord]] might possibly change gender when they [[regeneration|regenerate]] was notably hinted at by [[John Nathan-Turner]] and [[Tom Baker]], when as a publicity stunt they suggested to the press that Baker's replacement in the role of [[the Doctor]] might be female, but the idea was never used on-screen. The idea entered fanon and occasionally appeared in spinoff media such as ''[[Interference]]'' and ''[[Exile]],'' before eventually being mentioned on-screen in ''[[The Doctor's Wife]].''
 


[[Category:Fan terminology]]
[[Category:Fan terminology]]

Latest revision as of 07:13, 3 April 2024

This article needs a big cleanup.

This page treats still somewhat treats canon as a valid concept regarding Doctor Who, despite there not being a canon. Just needs a general cleanup in that regard.
As a suggested addition to this page, it could mention how it is commonly believed that the Doctor has been portrayed as a Time Lord since AUC despite that not being correct.

These problems might be so great that the article's factual accuracy has been compromised. Talk about it here or check the revision history or Manual of Style for more information.

RealWorld.png

Fanon is a body of popular suppositions and theories accepted by fans concerning the Doctor Who universe. It is a portmanteau of the words "fan" and "canon".

Fanon often gets confused for "canon", even if it is not supported by evidence either on screen or in print.

Derivations[[edit] | [edit source]]

When stories break fanon conventions, it can cause controversy. A longstanding piece of fanon is the supposition that the Doctor, due to his alien nature, is incapable of romance or sexual attraction. Despite the existence of a granddaughter, and occasional minor references during the early years of the show, much of this supposition stems from the Fourth Doctor's odd reference to Countess Scarlioni in City of Death as "a beautiful woman, probably," as well as the 1963-89 series' general aversion to including romantic entanglements due to its long-standing image as a children's program. The Doctor Who 1996 telefilm was controversial with some fans in that it showed the Eighth Doctor kissing Grace Holloway twice, the latter in an unambiguously romantic way, which was accused of violating canon, even though it only violated fanon. The revived series has since thoroughly rendered this piece of fanon moot by featuring later Doctors in numerous romantic situations and entanglements; several novels published since 1991 have also featured romantic situations for the Doctor previously considered taboo; examples include Human Nature and the conclusion of The Dying Days.

An example of fanon stemming from the series revival is the question of "TARDIS coral". Fans have come to use this term to refer to pieces of TARDIS obtained by Jack Harkness (Torchwood) and the Meta-Crisis Tenth Doctor (TV: Journey's End - deleted scene). In fact, as of July 2009 no episode has ever used the term to describe these objects, nor have any close-ups indicated whether they are, indeed, coral-like. The issue is further muddied by the fact the Journey's End reference was deleted from the final episode, raising the question of its canonicity.

When fanon becomes canon[[edit] | [edit source]]

Fanon and canon are not necessarily exclusive of each other. It has been occasionally known for elements originating in fanon to be adopted into canon.

In spin-offs[[edit] | [edit source]]

The BBC has never made a firm proclamation regarding whether novels and other spin-off works should be considered canonical in relation to their television series. Still, spin-off media have been known to add elements of fanon into their own canon.

Some fan theories, such as the Season 6B theory, while not as yet explicitly confirmed on-screen, have been supported by expanded universe spin-offs such as novels. Others, such as the question raised by Planet of Fire as to whether the Doctor and the Master are actually brothers, have been denied by off-screen sources, if not necessarily on-screen.

The aforementioned Season 6B theory comes close to being "canon", having been featured in a BBC Past Doctor Adventures novel and endorsed by former script editor Terrance Dicks (who wrote the book in question, World Game). This theory started with a series of 1969 TV Comic stories featuring a companion-less Second Doctor exiled on Earth (and, after a few adventures, being forced to regenerate inside his TARDIS), and continued with his involvement in both The Five Doctors and The Two Doctors.

In televised Doctor Who[[edit] | [edit source]]

Occasionally, a piece of fanon will find its way not just into the spinoffs, but into Doctor Who proper.