File talk:10docs.jpg: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Stardizzy2 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:Sure, why not, It's good that the Ninth and Tenth images are from actual stories rather than publicity shots. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:02, 10 December 2008 (UTC) | :Sure, why not, It's good that the Ninth and Tenth images are from actual stories rather than publicity shots. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:02, 10 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
::actually, they both look like publicity shots. two suggestions: the portraits could go in chronological order and the whopping big logo, which looks out of place... of course I think that you'd have to start a new image from scratch to "correct" these things. --[[User:Stardizzy2|Stardizzy2]] 19:52, 10 December 2008 (UTC) | ::actually, they both look like publicity shots. two suggestions: the portraits could go in chronological order and the whopping big logo, which looks out of place... of course I think that you'd have to start a new image from scratch to "correct" these things. BTW, I've never seen the Troughton image before. good find! --[[User:Stardizzy2|Stardizzy2]] 19:52, 10 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::While we're sticking things on the wish list (I would have a go at fixing it but don't currently have any image editing software available), anyways, a new picture of McGann, even from one of the publicity shot, just not the one that's currently in the image. (Now that I do look at the original they do all look promotional shot-like), but the new 9 and 10 shots look less recognisably like promo shots. Also, yes if this is going to continue to be on [[The Doctor]] article the DW logo needn't be in the image. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:32, 11 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:34, 11 December 2008
Main image[[edit source]]
I took a shot at slightly improving the main image. I replaced the image of the Second, Fourth, Ninth, and Tenth Doctors. However, I have not uploaded it to the wikia yet. However, I have uploaded it to Imageshack, http://img119.imageshack.us/img119/3444/10docww8.jpg What do you think, can this be uploaded to replace the current edition?
- Sure, why not, It's good that the Ninth and Tenth images are from actual stories rather than publicity shots. --Tangerineduel 13:02, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
- actually, they both look like publicity shots. two suggestions: the portraits could go in chronological order and the whopping big logo, which looks out of place... of course I think that you'd have to start a new image from scratch to "correct" these things. BTW, I've never seen the Troughton image before. good find! --Stardizzy2 19:52, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
- While we're sticking things on the wish list (I would have a go at fixing it but don't currently have any image editing software available), anyways, a new picture of McGann, even from one of the publicity shot, just not the one that's currently in the image. (Now that I do look at the original they do all look promotional shot-like), but the new 9 and 10 shots look less recognisably like promo shots. Also, yes if this is going to continue to be on The Doctor article the DW logo needn't be in the image. --Tangerineduel 13:32, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
![[edit source]](/w/index.php?title=File_talk:10docs.jpg&action=edit§ion=1){kind=link}
