Talk:Snap: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) (→Cleanup: new section) |
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Since so many of us have had to clean up this page, maybe it's taking the wrong approach. We have other pages highlighting expressions, jargon, etc, so maybe we should change this from the game to the expression, if there's no in-universe evidence of the game itself. Just a thought. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:40, January 23, 2014 (UTC) | Since so many of us have had to clean up this page, maybe it's taking the wrong approach. We have other pages highlighting expressions, jargon, etc, so maybe we should change this from the game to the expression, if there's no in-universe evidence of the game itself. Just a thought. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:40, January 23, 2014 (UTC) | ||
:I'd search through every instance of the word "snap" in DWU prose for mentions of the card game, but there's there are literally only 20 books in my collection without instances of that word, and my collection's quite expansive. Since I don't feel like going through hundreds of books manually, I just went with your suggestion, and rewrote it as more of an article on the expression itself — which is the only thing expressed in the DWU, as far as I'm aware — with a BTS on its origin. Is it any better now?<br>--[[user:SmallerOnTheOutside|SOTO]] [[User talk:SmallerOnTheOutside|☎]] 00:08, January 24, 2014 (UTC) | |||
::Much better. If someone can find an instance of the game in the DWU, they can add it. I know I've never come across it as a game in my prose collection. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 01:16, January 24, 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:16, 24 January 2014
Cleanup[[edit source]]
Since so many of us have had to clean up this page, maybe it's taking the wrong approach. We have other pages highlighting expressions, jargon, etc, so maybe we should change this from the game to the expression, if there's no in-universe evidence of the game itself. Just a thought. Shambala108 ☎ 17:40, January 23, 2014 (UTC)
- I'd search through every instance of the word "snap" in DWU prose for mentions of the card game, but there's there are literally only 20 books in my collection without instances of that word, and my collection's quite expansive. Since I don't feel like going through hundreds of books manually, I just went with your suggestion, and rewrote it as more of an article on the expression itself — which is the only thing expressed in the DWU, as far as I'm aware — with a BTS on its origin. Is it any better now?
--SOTO ☎ 00:08, January 24, 2014 (UTC)- Much better. If someone can find an instance of the game in the DWU, they can add it. I know I've never come across it as a game in my prose collection. Shambala108 ☎ 01:16, January 24, 2014 (UTC)
