User talk:Catkind121: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
 
(31 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Welcome|[[User:Catkind121]]|''--[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:24, 15 March 2008 (UTC)''}}
{{Welcome|[[User:Catkind121]]|''--[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:24, 15 March 2008 (UTC)''}}


== Re your message on my page ==


== What I like in Doctor who ==
Hello Catkind
Hello every body I am a true fan of Doctor who and all its spin-offs. Such as Torchwood and the Sarah Jane adventures. What pages I like to edit.
Thank you for asking me my opinion about your idea. A slight modification, I would make sure there is protection on the individual pages. [[User:Bigshowbower|Bigshowbower]] 12:41, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
I like to edit as much as possibley can. I would like to Edit after an episode has been broadcast. But I have a few good pionters for any one who looks at this page.
Make Templates for
*Space Ships
*Citys 
*Alien Races
*Battles and extraterestrail events that have happened such as the Adipose beem or the Slitheen insisdent.


My favourite Characters
==n/a on individual infoboxes==
*[[Martha Jones]]
I've been altering many of the infoboxes on this wiki so if you don't put something in a field on an infobox it won't appear. So for individual infoboxes that don't have an actor, don't put anything and the actor field won't appear. Thanks. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 06:04, October 14, 2009 (UTC)
*[[Rose Tyler]]
*[[Donna Noble]]
*and of course [[the Doctor]]


==Recent edits==
==Actors who have appeared in Eastenders==
Looking at some of your recent edits, all in-universe articles should be written from a past tense point of view. Out-of-universe articles should also be written from a past tense point of view within reason (for instance actors who are still alive should be written in present tense). Additionally, it would help not to create pages for people who have yet to appear in episodes as we currently do no know the full names of characters (titles are not names and therefore should not be included within the wikilinks). Also on a side note your above notes would perhaps be best suited to [[User:Catkind121]] (your user page, rather than here the talk page). --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 17:32, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
That should be fine, my general rule for categories is as long as there's more than 3 things within that category than it's okay to exist (anything less than three they can usually be classified elsewhere). --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:41, November 4, 2009 (UTC)


==What did I do wrong?==
==Feature Article==
Excuse me but I recently added some categories to the [[Jenny]] article and could not help but notice that you removed them when you made your edits (good job on that by the way). I don't feel angry or upset about this but I really would like to know why you removed them so I can avoid making potential mistakes in the future, Thanks in advance. -- [[User:Omegabrain|Omegabrain]] 19:12, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I've been in the slow process of trying to work out a way to make the Feature Article process get some sort of results. As such I've just implemented a new Feature Article process, see Feature Article policy (now obsoleted) and Feature Article nominations. I've added your nomination of [[The Trickster]] to the December nomination, if you'd like it to be for a different month feel free to move it. I'm hoping this system will give us actual results rather than the stalled system that's current in place. Thanks. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:17, November 7, 2009 (UTC)


==Wikilinks / tags in real world articles==
==Templates for every Doctor==
Just curious as to the reasoning behind tags such as <nowiki>(<!-- *{{Wikipedia|}} -->, <!-- *{{imdb name|id=|name=}} -->, <!-- [[Real World|]] --> etc)</nowiki> you may have noticed they don't do anything. Please don't add them they generally just make the edit box cluttered and hard to edit. To add a wikipedia link, inline it is <nowiki>[[Wikpedia:Wikipedia article name|Words you wish to appear in article]]</nowiki> (example: [[Wikipedia:Agatha Christie|Agatha Christie]]), for a wikipedia box that links out it is <nowiki>{{wikipediainfo}}</nowiki> example: see the [[DNA]] article for an example of the wikipedia link box. Thanks. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:56, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm fine with it in theory (I haven't really worked on any of those specific novel boxes).  


==Re prop delete on Ella McAvery article==
The only issue I see ahead is that dealing with other Doctors (other than the Ninth, Tenth and Eleventh Doctors) is that Doctors One - Seven have all been in novels across at least two ranges; the Virgin New/Missing Adventures and the BBC Books Past Doctor/Eighth Doctor ranges. (There's also the Telos Novella range to consider)  
(This discussion should really be carried out on the article talk page). The answer is in how the article is written, they're fictional concepts, created for Donna and Lee, they weren't characters in and of themselves. As such I didn't see the nessecity of them. Additionally should they be kept, how should they be categorised? They're sort of [[:Category:Fictional characters]] but not in the commonly accepted manner, they're sort of [[:Category:Personifications of concepts]] but not really either. I suppose they could be categorised in [[:Category:51st century individuals]], but the question is are they individuals only when we see them at the end with Song? As the rest of the time they're fulfilling a role to keep Donna and Lee sated and safe? --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC)


== Prisoner of the Daleks ==
Would these Doctor novel templates be going on the individual Doctor pages or the various novel pages? I'm just worried about the size and focus of the template as these templates would cover 2-3 ranges, unlike the current novel templates that just cover the NSAs.
I remade the article with the correct template and image :) [[User:Dark Lord Xander|Dark Lord Xander]] 09:25, 29 July 2008 (UTC)


:I'm sorry about Prisoner of the Daleks, I was going through the recent new pages and sometimes only spare some pages a quick look. As for infoboxes, it's very easy to go to a novel page, copy the infobox and then paste the copied infobox into the new page, then substitute the information from the copied infobox with the information you wish to place in the article. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 12:53, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
If all this information's going to be contained on within the template it's going to need to be clearly marked out. Though this would create quite a long list to cram into the template especially for the Seventh and Eighth Doctors.  


:To assist in the page layout of new novel pages you can also just copy the whole of a page (not just the infobox) and substitte in the information you wish to add, rather than the mix of TV and novel styles in your recent Judoon novel addition. (just a suggestion). --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:16, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
The Torchwood novel range is actually quite simple and straight forward much like the Ninth/Tenth/Eleventh Doctor novel templates. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:06, January 4, 2010 (UTC)


==Leaving messages on User's user page==
== DeltonMenace ==
Please be aware when leaving messages for other users to leave it on their '''talk page''', it is not considered good form to alter a User's user page (it also is noted in our [[Tardis:Vandalism and Unhelpful Content Policy]]). I have moved your message from [[User:CzechOut]]'s user page to his talk page. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:12, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
==Battle pages==
HIya :)  Got your message.  I would've thought the rationales given on the talk pages would have explained that I'm not actually deleting the pages.  I'm not an admin and don't have that power, anyway.  All I'm doing by flagging these battle/event pages is to try to create debate.  Logic demands that if [[Talk:Skirmish at Tranquil Repose]]  now has wide support for deletion, many of the rest need to be culled as well.  A quick look at their "What links here" pages shows that most are basically stale pages (i.e., they're largely unused in other articles).  I mean, c'mon, "[[Battle on the Dalek Saucer]]"?  That's a totally invented name.  Most editors wouldn't think for a moment that such a page exists, so they wouldn't link to them.  And the reason they wouldn't think they exist is because, in actual point of fact, most of these things ''don't exist''.  We've ''created'' these articles out of nothing, giving them names where none was given by any script or other source. '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]'''  [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 17:26, 29 July 2008 (UTC)


==Infobox removal==
I like that you stand up to him. As I read the Howling before the last specials, he seemed to go insane! Someone needed to stand up to him, and you do a great job returning everything to the rational. I'm on your side. [[User:Zach Schmidt|Zach Schmidt]] 23:49, January 8, 2010 (UTC)
The infobox didn't add anything to the page, it almost detracted from the page's information. (It also repeated or misrepresented information found on the [[Gallifreyan]] page).


There is an infobox for [[Gallifreyan]]s, who are a 'species', the first sentence of the Time Lords article states that they are 'rulers', the Gallifreyans article also backs this up, 'not all Gallifreyans were members of the august society...'.
I don't think it is about sides but he dos go of on rants. --Catkind121 09:47, January 9, 2010 (UTC)


Also as the infobox stood the link for notable individuals went to the [[List of Individual Time Lords]], which isn't quite accurate as not all the people in the list are technically 'notable'. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 12:57, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
==New users==
A wiki is by definition an open and editable by anyone, so forcing new users to read the MoS is tricky.


== Re - The Message you left on my discussion page ==
If there was a way to make them look at the MoS when they clicked an edit button it would need to be applied across the whole wiki and for all users (in theory anyways).


Hello, my intention was never to vandelise, the pages I edited only to remove the character that had no pages, I find it silly to type something, allow to be linkable and than link it to nothing, yes I could have editied the links and made pages but I have not read the books. I am not looking to get into an arguement simple just present my reasons for editing.
Any new users you come across you can always add the [[Template:Welcome IP]] template to their page: <nowiki>{{Welcome IP|}}</nowiki> (you can leave your signature after the | like this <nowiki>{{Welcome IP|--~~~~}}</nowiki>, or just leave it as this <nowiki>{{Welcome IP|}}</nowiki>. This adds template with links off to the help page and other pages that may be of use to new users. Thanks, I and the other admins will continue to keep and eye out for vandalism. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:44, February 18, 2010 (UTC)
[[User:Bigshowbower|Bigshowbower]] 05:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 
== Cleanup ==
 
For the Time Field page, what exactly is it that needs cleaning up? [[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 13:13, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
*Just now it can actually be in present tense as the cracks are an ongoing thing. See [[Tardis:Manual of Style#Tense|here]]. Other than that, I can't see anything that's outwith the Manual of style. [[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 13:24, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
**But I'm not wrong. Even if you think I am. The manual of style clearly states that ongoing events are not in the past tense. The cracks are presently ongoing, so should be in the present tense. [[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 13:35, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
 
==Assistance with a discussion on the forums==
Hi, I'd value your input/discussion on this topic in the forums [[Forum:Italics or Quotation marks?]], I'm not comfortable making a ruling solely based on a running conversation between myself and CzechOut and would value other regular editors' points of view on this issue. Thanks. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 06:36, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
 
== sooo ^_^ ==
 
[[File:Cheetah_per.jpg|thumb]][[File:Karra.jpg|thumb]]
File:Doctorwho_survival_470_470x300.jpg
[[File:Gridlock_593-1-.jpg|thumb|left]][[File:Cheetahp.jpg|thumb]]so you like the cheetah people and catkind too [[File:Cheetahs.jpg|thumb]]uh. its good to know im not the only one who liked them Kingdomcode 20:18, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
{{Please see|Can we disable visual editor please?}} <br> {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}04:48: Tue&nbsp;20 Dec 2011&nbsp;</span>
{{Please see|Can we disable visual editor please?}} <br> {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}18:50: Thu&nbsp;22 Dec 2011&nbsp;</span>
{{Christmas greetings}}

Latest revision as of 03:47, 17 November 2018

Welcome to the
Site-logo.png
• Catkind121 •

Thanks for your recent edits! I'm Jimbo, your robot wiki representative! We hope you'll keep on editing with us. This is actually a great time to have joined, because we're now fully independent, and working on a host of new features!

We've got a couple of important quirks for a fan written wiki, so let's get them out of the way first.

British English, please

We generally use British English 'round these parts, so if you use another form of English, please be sure you set your spell checker to BrEng, and take a gander at our spelling cheat card.

Spoilers aren't cool

We have a strict definition of "spoiler" that you may find a bit unusual. Basically, a spoiler, to us, is anything that comes from a story which has not been released yet. So, even if you've got some info from a BBC press release or official trailer, it basically can't be referenced here. In other words, you gotta wait until the episode has finished its premiere broadcast to start editing about its contents. Please check the spoiler policy for more details.

Other useful stuff

Aside from those two things, we also have some pages that you should probably read when you get a chance, like:

If you're brand new to wiki editing — and we all were, once! —  you probably want to check out these tutorials at Wikipedia, the world's largest wiki:

Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes like this:
~ ~ ~ ~

Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the Help pages, add a question to one of the Forums or ask an admin.


Re your message on my page[[edit source]]

Hello Catkind Thank you for asking me my opinion about your idea. A slight modification, I would make sure there is protection on the individual pages. Bigshowbower 12:41, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

n/a on individual infoboxes[[edit source]]

I've been altering many of the infoboxes on this wiki so if you don't put something in a field on an infobox it won't appear. So for individual infoboxes that don't have an actor, don't put anything and the actor field won't appear. Thanks. --Tangerineduel 06:04, October 14, 2009 (UTC)

Actors who have appeared in Eastenders[[edit source]]

That should be fine, my general rule for categories is as long as there's more than 3 things within that category than it's okay to exist (anything less than three they can usually be classified elsewhere). --Tangerineduel 14:41, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

Feature Article[[edit source]]

Hi. I've been in the slow process of trying to work out a way to make the Feature Article process get some sort of results. As such I've just implemented a new Feature Article process, see Feature Article policy (now obsoleted) and Feature Article nominations. I've added your nomination of The Trickster to the December nomination, if you'd like it to be for a different month feel free to move it. I'm hoping this system will give us actual results rather than the stalled system that's current in place. Thanks. --Tangerineduel 13:17, November 7, 2009 (UTC)

Templates for every Doctor[[edit source]]

I'm fine with it in theory (I haven't really worked on any of those specific novel boxes).

The only issue I see ahead is that dealing with other Doctors (other than the Ninth, Tenth and Eleventh Doctors) is that Doctors One - Seven have all been in novels across at least two ranges; the Virgin New/Missing Adventures and the BBC Books Past Doctor/Eighth Doctor ranges. (There's also the Telos Novella range to consider)

Would these Doctor novel templates be going on the individual Doctor pages or the various novel pages? I'm just worried about the size and focus of the template as these templates would cover 2-3 ranges, unlike the current novel templates that just cover the NSAs.

If all this information's going to be contained on within the template it's going to need to be clearly marked out. Though this would create quite a long list to cram into the template especially for the Seventh and Eighth Doctors.

The Torchwood novel range is actually quite simple and straight forward much like the Ninth/Tenth/Eleventh Doctor novel templates. --Tangerineduel 13:06, January 4, 2010 (UTC)

DeltonMenace[[edit source]]

I like that you stand up to him. As I read the Howling before the last specials, he seemed to go insane! Someone needed to stand up to him, and you do a great job returning everything to the rational. I'm on your side. Zach Schmidt 23:49, January 8, 2010 (UTC)

I don't think it is about sides but he dos go of on rants. --Catkind121 09:47, January 9, 2010 (UTC)

New users[[edit source]]

A wiki is by definition an open and editable by anyone, so forcing new users to read the MoS is tricky.

If there was a way to make them look at the MoS when they clicked an edit button it would need to be applied across the whole wiki and for all users (in theory anyways).

Any new users you come across you can always add the Template:Welcome IP template to their page: {{Welcome IP|}} (you can leave your signature after the | like this {{Welcome IP|--~~~~}}, or just leave it as this {{Welcome IP|}}. This adds template with links off to the help page and other pages that may be of use to new users. Thanks, I and the other admins will continue to keep and eye out for vandalism. --Tangerineduel 13:44, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

Cleanup[[edit source]]

For the Time Field page, what exactly is it that needs cleaning up? The Thirteenth Doctor 13:13, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

  • Just now it can actually be in present tense as the cracks are an ongoing thing. See here. Other than that, I can't see anything that's outwith the Manual of style. The Thirteenth Doctor 13:24, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
    • But I'm not wrong. Even if you think I am. The manual of style clearly states that ongoing events are not in the past tense. The cracks are presently ongoing, so should be in the present tense. The Thirteenth Doctor 13:35, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Assistance with a discussion on the forums[[edit source]]

Hi, I'd value your input/discussion on this topic in the forums Forum:Italics or Quotation marks?, I'm not comfortable making a ruling solely based on a running conversation between myself and CzechOut and would value other regular editors' points of view on this issue. Thanks. --Tangerineduel 06:36, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

sooo ^_^[[edit source]]

Cheetah per.jpg
Karra.jpg

File:Doctorwho_survival_470_470x300.jpg

Gridlock 593-1-.jpg
Cheetahp.jpg

so you like the cheetah people and catkind too

Cheetahs.jpg

uh. its good to know im not the only one who liked them Kingdomcode 20:18, September 20, 2010 (UTC)

Your input is needed!

You are invited to join the discussion at Forum:Can we disable visual editor please?.

czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 04:48: Tue 20 Dec 2011 

Your input is needed!

You are invited to join the discussion at Forum:Can we disable visual editor please?.

czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 18:50: Thu 22 Dec 2011 

Christmas cheer[[edit source]]

Happy holidays!

As this fiftieth anniversary year comes to a close, we here at Tardis just want to thank you for being a part of our community — even if you haven't edited here in a while. If you have edited with us this year, then thanks for all your hard work.

This year has seen an impressive amount of growth. We've added about 11,000 pages this year, which is frankly incredible for a wiki this big. November was predictably one of the busiest months we've ever had: over 500 unique editors pitched in. It was the highest number of editors in wiki history for a year in which only one programme in the DWU was active. And our viewing stats have been through the roof. We've averaged well over 2 million page views each week for the last two months, with some weeks seeing over 4 million views!

We've received an unprecedented level of support from Wikia Staff, resulting in all sorts of new goodies and productive new relationships. And we've recently decided to lift almost every block we've ever made so as to allow most everyone a second chance to be part of our community.

2014 promises to build on this year's foundations, especially since we've got a full, unbroken series coming up — something that hasn't happened since 2011. We hope you'll stick with us — or return to the Tardis — so that you can be a part of the fun!

TardisDataCoreRoadway.png
Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Catkind121&oldid=2586088"