Talk:Horath: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m (Cybernetic creature) |
Stardizzy2 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I haven't yet seen these episodes, as I'm stuck in the US, but I went ahead and changed it from computer to cybernetic creature. I chose the name because it applies to all the basic options, computerized, organic, an extreme to one end or the other - the term fits. Hope it's agreeable.--[[User:TheOmnius|TheOmnius]] 07:18, 4 February 2009 (UTC) | :I haven't yet seen these episodes, as I'm stuck in the US, but I went ahead and changed it from computer to cybernetic creature. I chose the name because it applies to all the basic options, computerized, organic, an extreme to one end or the other - the term fits. Hope it's agreeable.--[[User:TheOmnius|TheOmnius]] 07:18, 4 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
::the inconsistency happened in the episodes themselves, or rather in dialogue in the episodes. since Horath never appeared on-screen, we can just state that he got described as a computer and also as a cyborg at different times. --[[User:Stardizzy2|Stardizzy2]] 00:46, 5 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Yes, very much so. Thank you. --[[Special:Contributions/92.0.220.4|92.0.220.4]] 00:20, 5 February 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 00:46, 5 February 2009
I question the description of Horath as a computer. Luke seemed to imply that he was a cyborg of some description. --86.130.132.0 23:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- I haven't yet seen these episodes, as I'm stuck in the US, but I went ahead and changed it from computer to cybernetic creature. I chose the name because it applies to all the basic options, computerized, organic, an extreme to one end or the other - the term fits. Hope it's agreeable.--TheOmnius 07:18, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- the inconsistency happened in the episodes themselves, or rather in dialogue in the episodes. since Horath never appeared on-screen, we can just state that he got described as a computer and also as a cyborg at different times. --Stardizzy2 00:46, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, very much so. Thank you. --92.0.220.4 00:20, 5 February 2009 (UTC)