|
|
| (14 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| * Name: Frogger 2
| | {{Please see|Can we disable visual editor please?}} <br> {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}16:09: Tue 20 Dec 2011 </span> |
| | | {{Christmas greetings}} |
| ==Timeline==
| |
| Hi, when adding / editing content in the timeline, please do not remove the prefixes to the stories that are listed there. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 17:15, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| What's a prefix --[[User:Frogger 2|Frogger 2]] 26 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| You have been warned about removing the prefix and below is guide of prefixes [[User:Bigshowbower|Bigshowbower]] 09:47, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| :[[DW]]: for the tv series both classic and new series
| |
| :[[TW]]: for Torchwood
| |
| :[[SJA]]: for the Sarah Jane Adventures
| |
| :[[PDA]]: for the Past Doctor Adventures line of novels
| |
| :[[EDA]]: for the Eight Doctor Adventures line of novels
| |
| :[[NDA]]: for the Ninth Doctor Adventures line of novels
| |
| :[[TDA]]: for the Tenth Doctor Adventures line of novels
| |
| :[[MA]]: for the Virgin Missing Adventures line of novels
| |
| :[[NA]]: for the Virgin New Adventures line of novels
| |
| | |
| | |
| ::Also see for a complete list [[Tardis:List of prefixes]].
| |
| ::Additionally I'm curious as to where you are sourcing the placement of the stories? Is it guess work, indications in the individual stories or the Doctor Who Reference Guide? I would caution against solely relying on the DW Ref Guide as several of their placements are arbitrary. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 11:56, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| :::Righty, but have you actually read the books, novels, etc that you're editing as some of them that you've edited I have and worked out how to place them by how it's mentioned.
| |
| :::I'll also add again that I'd advise against solely relying on one the clivebanks website (as with the DW Ref Guide you should also rely on what you've read in the books, or seen/heard etc). Also as with the DW Ref Guide you shouldn't be copying verbatim what is written on that site. The timeline is tricky and should be written as part of an informed opinion rather than copying from one site or another. Thanks --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *Cool will do. --[[User:Frogger 2|Frogger 2]] 26 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ===Case in point===
| |
| Just like to add, [[Time and Relative]], this occurs after [[Frayed]], but was published before it (first in fact), however Frayed occurs some where before Susan and the Doctor arrive on Earth '63, [[Operation Proteus]] includes direct references and indications that it occurs just about before An Unearthly Child (or there abouts). Therefore it Time and Relative take place before it (various indicators about the Doctor's personality also point towards this placement). Whilst [[The Exiles]] takes place sometime before all these stories. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:43, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ==Quote of the Week==
| |
| Following the frankly random changing of the quotes there is now a process for quotes. See [[Tardis:Quote of the Week nominations]] to nominate a quote for this and coming weeks (this week's can still be changed, as long as it's nominated and voted for) and the [[Tardis:Quote of the Week policy]]. Thanks. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:23, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| :I'm sorry to cause offence. Your quote has been re-instated. But nominations for future weeks will remain to keep a fair system that everyone has a chance to participate in. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:44, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ::Quote of the Week was first discussed in May 2008 [[Forum:Quote of the Week]]. Wikis are a join effort where everyone should be able to contribute which is all I'm trying to do with the nomination process. It's half likely that there will be hardly any nominations for each week, in which case it would just be a formality to nominate your quotes, even if others nominate surely that is a good thing that people are getting involved with something kick started? --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
Your input is needed!
You are invited to join the discussion at Forum:Can we disable visual editor please?.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 16:09: Tue 20 Dec 2011
Happy holidays!
As this fiftieth anniversary year comes to a close, we here at Tardis just want to thank you for being a part of our community — even if you haven't edited here in a while. If you have edited with us this year, then thanks for all your hard work.
This year has seen an impressive amount of growth. We've added about 11,000 pages this year, which is frankly incredible for a wiki this big. November was predictably one of the busiest months we've ever had: over 500 unique editors pitched in. It was the highest number of editors in wiki history for a year in which only one programme in the DWU was active. And our viewing stats have been through the roof. We've averaged well over 2 million page views each week for the last two months, with some weeks seeing over 4 million views!
We've received an unprecedented level of support from Wikia Staff, resulting in all sorts of new goodies and productive new relationships. And we've recently decided to lift almost every block we've ever made so as to allow most everyone a second chance to be part of our community.
2014 promises to build on this year's foundations, especially since we've got a full, unbroken series coming up — something that hasn't happened since 2011. We hope you'll stick with us — or return to the Tardis — so that you can be a part of the fun!
