Howling:Series 9 two-parter or not: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{forumheader|The Howling}}{{cat|contains spoilers}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> According to Wikia C...") Tag: sourceedit |
m (-spoilers_cat) Tag: apiedit |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Archive|The Howling archives}}<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> | |||
According to Wikia Contributor [[http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/5.67.73.1|5.67.73.1]] we should not list [[Series 9 (Doctor Who)|Series 9]] episodes 5 and 6 as a two-parter because it is not a two-parter, however it has been told that these episodes are just not a "conventional" two-parter but more of a linked story, and I would say it is appropriate therefore to list them in one box. | According to Wikia Contributor [[http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/5.67.73.1|5.67.73.1]] we should not list [[Series 9 (Doctor Who)|Series 9]] episodes 5 and 6 as a two-parter because it is not a two-parter, however it has been told that these episodes are just not a "conventional" two-parter but more of a linked story, and I would say it is appropriate therefore to list them in one box. | ||
Line 10: | Line 9: | ||
I wasn't able to find this "official Doctor Who website" myself, and no link was given. I don't want to begin an edit-war with this person. | I wasn't able to find this "official Doctor Who website" myself, and no link was given. I don't want to begin an edit-war with this person. | ||
Any suggestions? | Any suggestions? --[[User:Danniesen|DCLM]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:12, July 11, 2015 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 18:47, 21 June 2017
Please DO NOT add to this discussion.
According to Wikia Contributor [[1]] we should not list Series 9 episodes 5 and 6 as a two-parter because it is not a two-parter, however it has been told that these episodes are just not a "conventional" two-parter but more of a linked story, and I would say it is appropriate therefore to list them in one box. He also states that episodes 9 and 10 are not a two-parter either, however these two episodes being the only two left, and Justin Molotnikov having been signed for a two-parter, contradicts this.
He said: It states clearly on the official Doctor Who website that 5 and 6 are not a two parter and that 9 and 10 are not a two parter
I wasn't able to find this "official Doctor Who website" myself, and no link was given. I don't want to begin an edit-war with this person.