Talk:The Zygon Invasion (TV story): Difference between revisions
Phil Boswell (talk | contribs) m (1.1 Cleanup (duplicated text)) Tag: sourceedit |
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) (→Synopsis removed: new section) Tag: sourceedit |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:: Agreed. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 20:24, November 6, 2015 (UTC) | :: Agreed. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 20:24, November 6, 2015 (UTC) | ||
Where was Osgood? | |||
The Doctor didn't fly to Truth or Consequences. He was in Turzmenistan with a UNIT Commander and her men; he found Osgood in the basement of the church after the UNIT soldiers were killed. | The Doctor didn't fly to Truth or Consequences. He was in Turzmenistan with a UNIT Commander and her men; he found Osgood in the basement of the church after the UNIT soldiers were killed. | ||
[[Special:Contributions/24.3.214.249|24.3.214.249]]<sup>[[User talk:24.3.214.249#top|talk to me]]</sup> 12:55, November 17, 2015 (UTC) | [[Special:Contributions/24.3.214.249|24.3.214.249]]<sup>[[User talk:24.3.214.249#top|talk to me]]</sup> 12:55, November 17, 2015 (UTC) | ||
: Can't say. It would be speculation. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 16:15, November 17, 2015 (UTC) | |||
== Synopsis removed == | |||
I've removed part of the synopsis for this episode because it was copied from the BBC website with just a few changes made in the wording. Per [[Tardis:Plagiarism]], we require original content on this site. A synopsis only needs about three sentences describing the basic idea of the episode. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 01:35, December 1, 2016 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:35, 1 December 2016
Companion?[[edit source]]
Perhaps I'm being a bit picky, but if Clara wasn't travelling with the Doctor, and more importantly, not taking part in the episode's events, doesn't that disqualify her as companion of the episode, like the previous week? --115.64.76.111talk to me 22:07, November 1, 2015 (UTC)
Previous two episodes are a two-parter?[[edit source]]
"another opportunity for the Doctor to reflect on his mortality, a theme which now appears to be limited to two-parters only, having been absent from the previous two episodes."
Isn't this factually incorrect? The Girl Who Died/The Woman Who Lived (the previous two episodes) were indeed a two-parter. Sure the plot did differ quite a bit, but they have the same story code.
Nsibai ☎ 03:39, November 6, 2015 (UTC)
- That's a discussion to be had on the other page. I would say that two stories being produced together does not make them a two-parter -- if what you've said is true. OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 03:49, November 6, 2015 (UTC)
It's been said right from the beginning (before the Series 9 start) that these episodes are not a conventional two-parter. They are simply linked stories. --DCLM ☎ 07:05, November 6, 2015 (UTC)
- I removed the statement in question, not because of this two-part of not two-part question, but because it was simply incorrect.--Skittles the hog - talk 12:06, November 6, 2015 (UTC)
- Agreed. OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 20:24, November 6, 2015 (UTC)
Where was Osgood?
The Doctor didn't fly to Truth or Consequences. He was in Turzmenistan with a UNIT Commander and her men; he found Osgood in the basement of the church after the UNIT soldiers were killed.
24.3.214.249talk to me 12:55, November 17, 2015 (UTC)
- Can't say. It would be speculation. OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 16:15, November 17, 2015 (UTC)
Synopsis removed[[edit source]]
I've removed part of the synopsis for this episode because it was copied from the BBC website with just a few changes made in the wording. Per Tardis:Plagiarism, we require original content on this site. A synopsis only needs about three sentences describing the basic idea of the episode. Shambala108 ☎ 01:35, December 1, 2016 (UTC)
