More actions
(Created page with '{{Forumheader|Panopticon}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> ==The problem== So. When you want to access a page...') |
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-[Ff]orum archives header +archive)) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{archive|Panopticon archives}}[[category:out of date]] | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
==The problem== | ==The problem== | ||
So. | So. When you want to access a page for an issue of a magazine, there's generally a simple formula: Prefix + Issue + XXX. For instance [[DWM Issue 100]], [[DWA Issue 3]], [[DWMS Summer 1993]]. Why, then, when you want to access an issue of ''Battles in Time'' is it [[Doctor Who: Battles in Time Issue 61]]? Shouldn't all these pages be moved to BIT Issue XXX? | ||
I don't think you'd have to go back and manually change existing links (though how many are there, really?) | I don't think you'd have to go back and manually change existing links (though how many are there, really?) But I think for consistency, it needs to work like the rest of the magazines. '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 17:52, 15 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I would rather the magazines have the issue names spelled out in full, but I agree. just for consistency. --[[User:Stardizzy2|Stardizzy2]] 17:58, 15 May 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 22:55, 6 May 2012
Forums → Archive index → Panopticon archives → Consistency in magazine issue pages
The problem[[edit source]]
So. When you want to access a page for an issue of a magazine, there's generally a simple formula: Prefix + Issue + XXX. For instance DWM Issue 100, DWA Issue 3, DWMS Summer 1993. Why, then, when you want to access an issue of Battles in Time is it Doctor Who: Battles in Time Issue 61? Shouldn't all these pages be moved to BIT Issue XXX?
I don't think you'd have to go back and manually change existing links (though how many are there, really?) But I think for consistency, it needs to work like the rest of the magazines. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 17:52, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- I would rather the magazines have the issue names spelled out in full, but I agree. just for consistency. --Stardizzy2 17:58, 15 May 2009 (UTC)