Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Forum:Consistency in magazine issue pages: Difference between revisions

The Cloisters
(Created page with '{{Forumheader|Panopticon}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> ==The problem== So. When you want to access a page...')
 
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-[Ff]orum archives header +archive))
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Forumheader|Panopticon}}
{{archive|Panopticon archives}}[[category:out of date]]
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
==The problem==
==The problem==
So. When you want to access a page for an issue of a magazine, there's generally a simple formula: Prefix + Issue + XXX. For instance [[DWM Issue 100]], [[DWA Issue 3]], [[DWMS Summer 1993]]. Why, then, when you want to access an issue of ''Battles in Time'' is it [[Doctor Who: Battles in Time Issue 61]]?   Shouldn't all these pages be moved to [[BIT Issue XXX]]?
So. When you want to access a page for an issue of a magazine, there's generally a simple formula: Prefix + Issue + XXX. For instance [[DWM Issue 100]], [[DWA Issue 3]], [[DWMS Summer 1993]]. Why, then, when you want to access an issue of ''Battles in Time'' is it [[Doctor Who: Battles in Time Issue 61]]? Shouldn't all these pages be moved to BIT Issue XXX?


I don't think you'd have to go back and manually change existing links (though how many are there, really?) But I think for consistency, it needs to work like the rest of the magazines. '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 17:52, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
I don't think you'd have to go back and manually change existing links (though how many are there, really?) But I think for consistency, it needs to work like the rest of the magazines. '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 17:52, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
==The discussion==
 
:I would rather the magazines have the issue names spelled out in full, but I agree. just for consistency. --[[User:Stardizzy2|Stardizzy2]] 17:58, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:55, 6 May 2012

ForumsArchive indexPanopticon archives → Consistency in magazine issue pages
This thread has been archived.
Please create a new thread on the new forums if you want to talk about this topic some more.
Please DO NOT add to this discussion.

The problem[[edit source]]

So. When you want to access a page for an issue of a magazine, there's generally a simple formula: Prefix + Issue + XXX. For instance DWM Issue 100, DWA Issue 3, DWMS Summer 1993. Why, then, when you want to access an issue of Battles in Time is it Doctor Who: Battles in Time Issue 61? Shouldn't all these pages be moved to BIT Issue XXX?

I don't think you'd have to go back and manually change existing links (though how many are there, really?) But I think for consistency, it needs to work like the rest of the magazines. CzechOut | 17:52, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

I would rather the magazines have the issue names spelled out in full, but I agree. just for consistency. --Stardizzy2 17:58, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.