Laud: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(refining categories)
Tag: sourceedit
m (Bot: Cosmetic changes)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Wikipediainfo|William Laud}}
{{wikipediainfo|William Laud}}
'''[[Archbishop of Canterbury|Archbishop]] {{PAGENAME}}''' was a contemporary of [[Charles I]].
'''[[Archbishop of Canterbury|Archbishop]] {{PAGENAME}}''' was a contemporary of [[Charles I]].


He was beautificating churches in England, causing a protest from puritans. The king failed to prevent his beheading at the behest of the [[Parliament]]. ([[PROSE]]: ''[[The Roundheads (novel)|The Roundheads]]'')
He was beautificating churches in England, causing a protest from puritans. The king failed to prevent his beheading at the behest of the [[Houses of Parliament|Parliament]] in [[January]] [[1649]]. ([[PROSE]]: ''[[The Roundheads (novel)|The Roundheads]]'')


== Behind the scenes ==
== Behind the scenes ==
Although the first name and the title of Archbishop of Canterbury are not explicitly mentioned in the story, the provided historical details leave no doubt that it is William Laud, the Archbishop of Canterbury, who is meant.
Although the first name and the title of Archbishop of Canterbury are not explicitly mentioned in the story, the provided historical details leave no doubt that it is William Laud, the Archbishop of Canterbury, who is meant.
{{NameSort}}
[[Category:17th century individuals]]
[[Category:17th century individuals]]
[[Category:Religious leaders from the real world]]
[[Category:Religious leaders from the real world]]

Latest revision as of 14:07, 26 February 2019

Laud

Archbishop Laud was a contemporary of Charles I.

He was beautificating churches in England, causing a protest from puritans. The king failed to prevent his beheading at the behest of the Parliament in January 1649. (PROSE: The Roundheads)

Behind the scenes[[edit]]

Although the first name and the title of Archbishop of Canterbury are not explicitly mentioned in the story, the provided historical details leave no doubt that it is William Laud, the Archbishop of Canterbury, who is meant.