More actions
(reply) |
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-[Ff]orum archives header +archive)) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{archive|Panopticon archives}}[[category:out of date]] | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
What's the difference between | What's the difference between | ||
:[[:template:cleanup]] | |||
and | :and | ||
:[[:template:Gone to Pot]] | |||
I was trying to update the top one, [[:template:cleanup]], when I realized that both templates actually place the offending page in the same category: [[:category:Articles in need of major additions]]. So if the practical effect is the same, why have two different messages? Wouldn't it make some sense to turn [[:template:cleanup]] into a redirect to [[:Template:Gone to Pot]]? '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 06:27, 24 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
I was trying to update the top one, [[:template:cleanup]], when I realized that both templates actually place the offending page in the same category: | |||
::Gone to Pot is an article with gigantic problems, but somewhere in the mess is the possibility of a good article, or at least a stub of an article. Cleanup is basically what it says, it needs a bit of a cleanup to get it up to standard, or it has some spelling, grammar or wikification errors. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 07:35, 24 May 2009 (UTC) | ::Gone to Pot is an article with gigantic problems, but somewhere in the mess is the possibility of a good article, or at least a stub of an article. Cleanup is basically what it says, it needs a bit of a cleanup to get it up to standard, or it has some spelling, grammar or wikification errors. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 07:35, 24 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::Okay, then why do they both automatically place the page in the same category? Shouldn't they be putting articles in to different categories? '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 21:43, 25 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::Gone to Pot has now been redirected to Cleanup. A new template [[:template:update]] had been added. '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 04:34, March 14, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:55, 6 May 2012
Forums → Archive index → Panopticon archives → Cleanup vs. Gone to Pot
What's the difference between
I was trying to update the top one, template:cleanup, when I realized that both templates actually place the offending page in the same category: category:Articles in need of major additions. So if the practical effect is the same, why have two different messages? Wouldn't it make some sense to turn template:cleanup into a redirect to Template:Gone to Pot? CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 06:27, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Gone to Pot is an article with gigantic problems, but somewhere in the mess is the possibility of a good article, or at least a stub of an article. Cleanup is basically what it says, it needs a bit of a cleanup to get it up to standard, or it has some spelling, grammar or wikification errors. --Tangerineduel 07:35, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, then why do they both automatically place the page in the same category? Shouldn't they be putting articles in to different categories? CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 21:43, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Gone to Pot has now been redirected to Cleanup. A new template template:update had been added. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 04:34, March 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, then why do they both automatically place the page in the same category? Shouldn't they be putting articles in to different categories? CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 21:43, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Gone to Pot is an article with gigantic problems, but somewhere in the mess is the possibility of a good article, or at least a stub of an article. Cleanup is basically what it says, it needs a bit of a cleanup to get it up to standard, or it has some spelling, grammar or wikification errors. --Tangerineduel 07:35, 24 May 2009 (UTC)