User talk:Will101: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Welcome)
 
m (Happy holidays)
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Welcome|Will101|--[[User:Dark Lord Xander|Dark Lord Xander]] 08:04, 19 June 2009 (UTC)}}
{{Welcome|Will101|--[[User:Dark Lord Xander|Dark Lord Xander]] 08:04, 19 June 2009 (UTC)}}
==Editing articles==
Hello. Just in response to the message left on Doug86's talk page. Different editors edit in different ways and often when you are reading through an article you see things at different points and it's often easier to edit in different sections rather than editing in one large slab. Additionally it's the very nature of a wiki that there will be frequent page edits (especially on an article such as Dalek).
Also just on a side note, the large gaps of space around the infoboxes on articles? It really makes the pages look odd when there are large gaps of space around the top of the article. Thanks. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:03, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
== Infobox Gaps ==
Thanks for replying, I thought any replies would be offensive or annoyed that I asked a question. Responding to your side note, I haven't been adding large spaces/gaps to articles. I don't know why it happens, I usually undo edits of unnamed people, like on the companion page where I removed Sarah Jane Smith and K-9 Mark III. I'm not sure why it's adding gaps, cos I agree that it would look a bit strange... :S [[User:Will101|Will101]] 16:48, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
==Problem Reports==
Hi. Problem reports are very sporadically checked on this wiki. It's better to chuck one of these [[Tardis:Templates#Cleanup_Tags]] (there's a whole list there), for things like Out of universe content (<nowiki>{{Oou}}</nowiki>) or for pages that are really far gone there is the <nowiki>{{Gone to Pot}}</nowiki> tag or for a page that needs a cleanup there is <nowiki>{{cleanup}}</nowiki>. Also it's better to reply to messages on the user's talk page (as I, nor other users keep an eye on every person's talk pages they leave messages on). Thanks. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 15:35, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
== Sibyl ==
Why did you remove Category:Cult leaders?
[[User:Americanwhofan|Americanwhofan]] 09:49, September 2, 2009 (UTC)
== re: your recent edits to 11th doctor talk page ==
can you please explain why both your most recent edits seem to have been reversions of edits on talk pages, from someone (i.e me) who is merely trying to get his views across without trying to compromise any views other people might have
regards,
--[[Special:Contributions/86.15.88.163|86.15.88.163]] 16:43, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
As you don't have an account, I'll have to reply here. The reason I removed your edits is because there is no need for speculation. For one, we have already been told that the [[Eleventh Doctor]] is the Eleventh incarnation, and not a younger [[First Doctor]], and secondly, there is a specific place for any speculation, found here at [[Howling:The Howling|The Howling]]. Regards, -- [[User:Will101|Will101]] 16:49, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
nothing says that Matt smith is playing the 11th incarnation, chronologically he is, but there are plenty of explanations for him being a previous version of William Hartnells doc, maybe even predating william hartnels doctor, its never been oficially said that william hartnell is the first incarnation of the doctor, and the new costume, logo and TARDIS seems to suggest a more old style doctor...--[[Special:Contributions/86.15.88.163|86.15.88.163]] 17:12, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
Matt Smith has specifically said that he is playing the [[Eleventh Doctor]], and the page on [[TARDIS Wiki]] is called the Eleventh Doctor, not Younger [[First Doctor]] or Previous Incarnation to William Hartnell's Doctor. -- [[User:Will101|Will101]] 17:14, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
firstly, all i have said is speculation, the page is entitled 11th doctor, because he is the 11th known incarnation of the doctor, the reason it doesn't say 'Younger 1st doctor' or anything similar is because it would seem at this point that matt smith is playing the 11th doctor. If you can find any reliable media clipping that involves matt smith ''saying'' he is the 11th doctor, then i will gladly leave you alone, but i am not aware of many, good luck--[[Special:Contributions/86.15.88.163|86.15.88.163]] 17:28, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
I don't know if you've seen any filming pictures, but there have been some with [[Matt Smith]] wearing [[David Tennant|David Tennant's]] brown suit, and carrying his [[Sonic Screwdriver]]. I don't think the younger [[First Doctor]] would have that. Also, go to the BBC Doctor Who Site, and they will continually call him the Eleventh Doctor. And as I said before, [[Howling:The Howling|The Howling]] is the place to go for speculation. -- [[User:Will101|Will101]] 17:32, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
:I hate to be childish, but in this case I really have to say, I told you so. -- [[User:Will101|Will101]] 18:14, January 5, 2010 (UTC)
==Lucy Saxon revert==
It is considered bad form to revert people's edits without providing justification within the Edit Summary or on the Talk Page for the article. As you reverted my edit to [[Lucy Saxon]] without performing this courtesy I have replaced my edit which I felt was a fair one. If I am incorrect in my edit, please indicate where in the episode it is stated that Lucy died in the explosion. There are literally dozens of examples of precedent in Doctor Who (the Master being Exhibit A) in which a character's apparent death has not been final. If anything Lucy's fate is more ambiguous than the Master's was at the end of Last of the Time Lords. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 23:25, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
{{Please see|Can we disable visual editor please?}} <br> {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}07:53: Wed&nbsp;21 Dec 2011&nbsp;</span>
{{Christmas greetings}}

Latest revision as of 10:27, 25 December 2013

Welcome to the
Site-logo.png
• Will101 •

Thanks for your recent edits! I'm Jimbo, your robot wiki representative! We hope you'll keep on editing with us. This is actually a great time to have joined, because we're now fully independent, and working on a host of new features!

We've got a couple of important quirks for a fan written wiki, so let's get them out of the way first.

British English, please

We generally use British English 'round these parts, so if you use another form of English, please be sure you set your spell checker to BrEng, and take a gander at our spelling cheat card.

Spoilers aren't cool

We have a strict definition of "spoiler" that you may find a bit unusual. Basically, a spoiler, to us, is anything that comes from a story which has not been released yet. So, even if you've got some info from a BBC press release or official trailer, it basically can't be referenced here. In other words, you gotta wait until the episode has finished its premiere broadcast to start editing about its contents. Please check the spoiler policy for more details.

Other useful stuff

Aside from those two things, we also have some pages that you should probably read when you get a chance, like:

If you're brand new to wiki editing — and we all were, once! —  you probably want to check out these tutorials at Wikipedia, the world's largest wiki:

Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes like this:
~ ~ ~ ~

Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the Help pages, add a question to one of the Forums or ask an admin.


Editing articles[[edit source]]

Hello. Just in response to the message left on Doug86's talk page. Different editors edit in different ways and often when you are reading through an article you see things at different points and it's often easier to edit in different sections rather than editing in one large slab. Additionally it's the very nature of a wiki that there will be frequent page edits (especially on an article such as Dalek).

Also just on a side note, the large gaps of space around the infoboxes on articles? It really makes the pages look odd when there are large gaps of space around the top of the article. Thanks. --Tangerineduel 13:03, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Infobox Gaps[[edit source]]

Thanks for replying, I thought any replies would be offensive or annoyed that I asked a question. Responding to your side note, I haven't been adding large spaces/gaps to articles. I don't know why it happens, I usually undo edits of unnamed people, like on the companion page where I removed Sarah Jane Smith and K-9 Mark III. I'm not sure why it's adding gaps, cos I agree that it would look a bit strange... :S Will101 16:48, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Problem Reports[[edit source]]

Hi. Problem reports are very sporadically checked on this wiki. It's better to chuck one of these Tardis:Templates#Cleanup_Tags (there's a whole list there), for things like Out of universe content ({{Oou}}) or for pages that are really far gone there is the {{Gone to Pot}} tag or for a page that needs a cleanup there is {{cleanup}}. Also it's better to reply to messages on the user's talk page (as I, nor other users keep an eye on every person's talk pages they leave messages on). Thanks. --Tangerineduel 15:35, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Sibyl[[edit source]]

Why did you remove Category:Cult leaders? Americanwhofan 09:49, September 2, 2009 (UTC)

re: your recent edits to 11th doctor talk page[[edit source]]

can you please explain why both your most recent edits seem to have been reversions of edits on talk pages, from someone (i.e me) who is merely trying to get his views across without trying to compromise any views other people might have regards, --86.15.88.163 16:43, December 13, 2009 (UTC)

As you don't have an account, I'll have to reply here. The reason I removed your edits is because there is no need for speculation. For one, we have already been told that the Eleventh Doctor is the Eleventh incarnation, and not a younger First Doctor, and secondly, there is a specific place for any speculation, found here at The Howling. Regards, -- Will101 16:49, December 13, 2009 (UTC)

nothing says that Matt smith is playing the 11th incarnation, chronologically he is, but there are plenty of explanations for him being a previous version of William Hartnells doc, maybe even predating william hartnels doctor, its never been oficially said that william hartnell is the first incarnation of the doctor, and the new costume, logo and TARDIS seems to suggest a more old style doctor...--86.15.88.163 17:12, December 13, 2009 (UTC)

Matt Smith has specifically said that he is playing the Eleventh Doctor, and the page on TARDIS Wiki is called the Eleventh Doctor, not Younger First Doctor or Previous Incarnation to William Hartnell's Doctor. -- Will101 17:14, December 13, 2009 (UTC)

firstly, all i have said is speculation, the page is entitled 11th doctor, because he is the 11th known incarnation of the doctor, the reason it doesn't say 'Younger 1st doctor' or anything similar is because it would seem at this point that matt smith is playing the 11th doctor. If you can find any reliable media clipping that involves matt smith saying he is the 11th doctor, then i will gladly leave you alone, but i am not aware of many, good luck--86.15.88.163 17:28, December 13, 2009 (UTC)

I don't know if you've seen any filming pictures, but there have been some with Matt Smith wearing David Tennant's brown suit, and carrying his Sonic Screwdriver. I don't think the younger First Doctor would have that. Also, go to the BBC Doctor Who Site, and they will continually call him the Eleventh Doctor. And as I said before, The Howling is the place to go for speculation. -- Will101 17:32, December 13, 2009 (UTC)

I hate to be childish, but in this case I really have to say, I told you so. -- Will101 18:14, January 5, 2010 (UTC)

Lucy Saxon revert[[edit source]]

It is considered bad form to revert people's edits without providing justification within the Edit Summary or on the Talk Page for the article. As you reverted my edit to Lucy Saxon without performing this courtesy I have replaced my edit which I felt was a fair one. If I am incorrect in my edit, please indicate where in the episode it is stated that Lucy died in the explosion. There are literally dozens of examples of precedent in Doctor Who (the Master being Exhibit A) in which a character's apparent death has not been final. If anything Lucy's fate is more ambiguous than the Master's was at the end of Last of the Time Lords. 23skidoo 23:25, January 4, 2010 (UTC)

Your input is needed!

You are invited to join the discussion at Forum:Can we disable visual editor please?.

czechout<staff />   07:53: Wed 21 Dec 2011 

Christmas cheer[[edit source]]

Happy holidays!

As this fiftieth anniversary year comes to a close, we here at Tardis just want to thank you for being a part of our community — even if you haven't edited here in a while. If you have edited with us this year, then thanks for all your hard work.

This year has seen an impressive amount of growth. We've added about 11,000 pages this year, which is frankly incredible for a wiki this big. November was predictably one of the busiest months we've ever had: over 500 unique editors pitched in. It was the highest number of editors in wiki history for a year in which only one programme in the DWU was active. And our viewing stats have been through the roof. We've averaged well over 2 million page views each week for the last two months, with some weeks seeing over 4 million views!

We've received an unprecedented level of support from Wikia Staff, resulting in all sorts of new goodies and productive new relationships. And we've recently decided to lift almost every block we've ever made so as to allow most everyone a second chance to be part of our community.

2014 promises to build on this year's foundations, especially since we've got a full, unbroken series coming up — something that hasn't happened since 2011. We hope you'll stick with us — or return to the Tardis — so that you can be a part of the fun!

TardisDataCoreRoadway.png