Talk:Thin Ice (TV story): Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(→‎Pure historical?: new section)
Tag: sourceedit
Tag: sourceedit
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:


I'd have to do a rewatch to find out if it's confirmed whether or not the creature is terrestrial, but should this be deemed a '''pseudo-historical story''' or a '''pure historical'''?{{User:SOTO/sig}} 16:06, April 30, 2017 (UTC)
I'd have to do a rewatch to find out if it's confirmed whether or not the creature is terrestrial, but should this be deemed a '''pseudo-historical story''' or a '''pure historical'''?{{User:SOTO/sig}} 16:06, April 30, 2017 (UTC)
::Even if the creature is not an alien per se, it's still something that doesn't exist in the real world and that's usually enough to qualify as a pseudo-historical.[[User:MystExplorer|MystExplorer]] [[User talk:MystExplorer|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:09, April 30, 2017 (UTC)
::: If that's not enough, also the excrement fuel that was used by Lord Sutcliffe was more powerful than what existed in reality. I say: pseudo-historical. [[User:Amorkuz|Amorkuz]] [[User talk:Amorkuz|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 23:05, May 1, 2017 (UTC)
:::: I usually say that if there's any element other than the TARDIS dropping the characters off that's an attempt to create something sci-fi or otherwise extremely fictional, then it's pseudo. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|Talk]]) 23:08, May 1, 2017 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:08, 1 May 2017

Early release on iTunes[[edit source]]

Just for clarity, the source for the early release on iTunes is my own personal viewing of the situation in the US iTunes Store, and on my various devices -- including the very weird behaviour on AppleTV. This situation was independently confirmed by SOTO, who had been alerted to check iTunes by yet a third user. I personally witnessed Apple's withdrawal of the episode from iTunes, and the timestamp on a message to SOTO set the estimated time of the beginning of the issue. We don't usually allow unsourced information, but in this case, it was directly witnessed by two admin.
czechout<staff />    01:22: Sun 30 Apr 2017

Pure historical?[[edit source]]

I'd have to do a rewatch to find out if it's confirmed whether or not the creature is terrestrial, but should this be deemed a pseudo-historical story or a pure historical?
×   SOTO  contribs ×°//]   °|💬| {/-//:\\ 16:06, April 30, 2017 (UTC)

Even if the creature is not an alien per se, it's still something that doesn't exist in the real world and that's usually enough to qualify as a pseudo-historical.MystExplorer 16:09, April 30, 2017 (UTC)
If that's not enough, also the excrement fuel that was used by Lord Sutcliffe was more powerful than what existed in reality. I say: pseudo-historical. Amorkuz 23:05, May 1, 2017 (UTC)
I usually say that if there's any element other than the TARDIS dropping the characters off that's an attempt to create something sci-fi or otherwise extremely fictional, then it's pseudo. OS25 (Talk) 23:08, May 1, 2017 (UTC)