Talk:Pete (Thin Ice): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary Tag: sourceedit |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Joke? == | == Joke? == | ||
Can we be sure that the character of Pete is a joke? With how Twelve is we can hardly prove it, and I say it's better to be safe than sorry. That is, let's assume he's a real character until evidence is provided to the contrary. [[User:Cats12|Cats12]] ([[User Talk:Cats12|Talk]]) 19:32, May 8, 2017 (UTC) | Can we be sure that the character of Pete is a joke? With how Twelve is we can hardly prove it, and I say it's better to be safe than sorry. That is, let's assume he's a real character until evidence is provided to the contrary. [[User:Cats12|Cats12]] ([[User Talk:Cats12|Talk]]) 19:32, May 8, 2017 (UTC) | ||
:It seems pretty obvious it's meant as a joke. --[[User:Time Lord|Time Lord]] [[User talk:Time Lord|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:12, May 8, 2017 (UTC) | |||
:: It is a joke. But that does in no way mean he can't have a page. --[[User:Danniesen|DCLM]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:40, May 8, 2017 (UTC) | |||
"It is a joke" you say, but surely we need a source for this? We could say it's ''ambiguous'' as to whether Pete is real or not. [[User:Cats12|Cats12]] ([[User Talk:Cats12|Talk]]) 21:05, May 8, 2017 (UTC) | |||
:No source necessary, as community consensus and common sense conclude it's a joke. Also, I'm not at all suggesting that the fact it is a joke means it can't have a page. Imo, it's fine as is. --[[User:Time Lord|Time Lord]] [[User talk:Time Lord|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:38, May 8, 2017 (UTC) | |||
::The Doctor and Bill exchange smiles over the joke, and we witness moments of realisation. There is no doubt that this is a joke, but, as has been said, that is not a reason for Pete not to have a page.{{User:SOTO/sig}} 00:01, May 9, 2017 (UTC) | |||
::: I know this is an old discussion, but I just wanna say I wouldn’t be at all surprised if some [[Faction Paradox]] story includes him in a real sense in future. I don’t doubt the writer didn’t intend for Pete to be real, but I equally don’t doubt that the DWU’s consensus will eventually end up that he is. [[Special:Contributions/217.44.55.79|217.44.55.79]]<sup>[[User talk:217.44.55.79#top|talk to me]]</sup> 14:32, May 11, 2020 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:32, 11 May 2020
Joke?[[edit source]]
Can we be sure that the character of Pete is a joke? With how Twelve is we can hardly prove it, and I say it's better to be safe than sorry. That is, let's assume he's a real character until evidence is provided to the contrary. Cats12 (Talk) 19:32, May 8, 2017 (UTC)
"It is a joke" you say, but surely we need a source for this? We could say it's ambiguous as to whether Pete is real or not. Cats12 (Talk) 21:05, May 8, 2017 (UTC)
- No source necessary, as community consensus and common sense conclude it's a joke. Also, I'm not at all suggesting that the fact it is a joke means it can't have a page. Imo, it's fine as is. --Time Lord ☎ 21:38, May 8, 2017 (UTC)
- The Doctor and Bill exchange smiles over the joke, and we witness moments of realisation. There is no doubt that this is a joke, but, as has been said, that is not a reason for Pete not to have a page.
× SOTO (☎/✍/↯) 00:01, May 9, 2017 (UTC)- I know this is an old discussion, but I just wanna say I wouldn’t be at all surprised if some Faction Paradox story includes him in a real sense in future. I don’t doubt the writer didn’t intend for Pete to be real, but I equally don’t doubt that the DWU’s consensus will eventually end up that he is. 217.44.55.79talk to me 14:32, May 11, 2020 (UTC)
- The Doctor and Bill exchange smiles over the joke, and we witness moments of realisation. There is no doubt that this is a joke, but, as has been said, that is not a reason for Pete not to have a page.
